Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #14319 > unrolled thread

Re: How to turn off those warning messages during ant build?

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.java.programmer

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: How to turn off those warning messages during ant build? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-05-05 20:47 -0400
    Re: How to turn off those warning messages during ant build? Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-05-07 09:31 -0700

#14319 — Re: How to turn off those warning messages during ant build?

On 4/15/2012 10:54 PM, Gene Wirchenko wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Apr 2012 21:07:40 -0400, Arne Vajhøj<arne@vajhoej.dk>
> wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
>> Are you claiming that it is poor software architecture/development
>> to write code that does not have a single flaw at time of being written
>> but 5 or 10 years later give warnings or errors with a new Java
>> version?
>
>       No, I am stating that if one switches compilers, all bets are
> off, and you had better test to make sure that the program still
> works.

That is rather irrelevant.

The discussion is whether it is technical debt that code
does not compile with future versions of compiler/library.

Arne

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#14361

On Sat, 05 May 2012 20:47:21 -0400, Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk>
wrote:

>On 4/15/2012 10:54 PM, Gene Wirchenko wrote:
>> On Fri, 13 Apr 2012 21:07:40 -0400, Arne Vajhøj<arne@vajhoej.dk>
>> wrote:
>>
>> [snip]
>>
>>> Are you claiming that it is poor software architecture/development
>>> to write code that does not have a single flaw at time of being written
>>> but 5 or 10 years later give warnings or errors with a new Java
>>> version?
>>
>>       No, I am stating that if one switches compilers, all bets are
>> off, and you had better test to make sure that the program still
>> works.
>
>That is rather irrelevant.
>
>The discussion is whether it is technical debt that code
>does not compile with future versions of compiler/library.

     No, it is whether changing to another compiler version can cause
technical debt.  Oh, yes.

Sincerely,

Gene Wirchenko

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.java.programmer

csiph-web