Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #21783

Re: The first 10 files

Show all headers | View raw

Peter Duniho <NpOeStPeAdM@NnOwSlPiAnMk.com> writes:

> On Sat, 26 Jan 2013 20:42:16 -0500, Eric Sosman wrote:
>
>> [...]
>>>>       Because the listFiles() method will fetch the information
>>>> for all 30K files from the O/S, will construct 30K File objects
>>>> to represent them, and will submit all 30K File objects to the
>>>> FileFilter, one by one.  The FileFilter will (very quickly)
>>>> reject 29.99K of the 30K Files, but ...
>>>
>>> Will it?
>> 
>>      Necessarily.  As far as listFiles() knows, the FileFilter
>> might accept the very last File object given to it.  Therefore,
>> listFiles() cannot fail to present that very last File -- and
>> every other File -- for inspection.
>
> Except in the way I already noted, you mean.
>
>> [...]
>>> Indeed, I suppose one could throw an exception from the FileFilter accept()
>>> method to interrupt enumeration, if that's how listFiles() is implemented.
>>> That would avoid the need to enumerate more than the needed number of
>>> actual files.
>> 
>>      It would also avoid the burden of returning anything from
>> listFiles() -- like, say, the array of accepted files ...
>
> As you've already agreed, it is possible for the FileFilter implementation
> to store the results itself, obviating any need for the listFiles() method
> to return successfully.
>
> If it works (which is not assured...it depends on how listFiles() is
> implemented in the first place), then yes, maybe it's a bit of a kludge.
> But it's an easier, more portable kludge than writing some JNI-based
> component and would in fact get the job done.
>
> Sometimes, when the library you're using doesn't provide exactly the
> features you need, you wind up with a kludge. Oh well...shit happens.
>
> I'm not saying it's a great solution. But it's a far cry from a conclusion
> that it simply cannot be done with the Java API as it exists now.

It's an abuse of the notion of a filter, but yes, it can be made to
work.  I stand corrected.

-- 
Jim Janney

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

The first 10 files Wojtek <nowhere@a.com> - 2013-01-26 01:14 -0800
  Re: The first 10 files Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2013-01-26 02:44 -0800
    Re: The first 10 files Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2013-01-26 10:20 -0800
  Re: The first 10 files "John B. Matthews" <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2013-01-26 06:31 -0500
    Re: The first 10 files Wojtek <nowhere@a.com> - 2013-01-26 15:42 -0800
      Re: The first 10 files Jim Janney <jjanney@shell.xmission.com> - 2013-01-26 17:13 -0700
      Re: The first 10 files Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-01-26 21:21 -0500
      Re: The first 10 files "John B. Matthews" <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2013-01-26 22:05 -0500
  Re: The first 10 files Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom2@eastlink.ca> - 2013-01-26 08:24 -0400
    Re: The first 10 files Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom2@eastlink.ca> - 2013-01-26 08:25 -0400
    Re: The first 10 files Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-01-26 13:26 -0500
      Re: The first 10 files Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2013-01-26 22:15 +0100
        Re: The first 10 files Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-01-26 16:25 -0500
        Re: The first 10 files Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2013-01-26 17:06 -0500
          Re: The first 10 files Peter Duniho <NpOeStPeAdM@NnOwSlPiAnMk.com> - 2013-01-26 15:21 -0800
            Re: The first 10 files Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2013-01-26 20:42 -0500
              Re: The first 10 files Peter Duniho <NpOeStPeAdM@NnOwSlPiAnMk.com> - 2013-01-26 17:56 -0800
                Re: The first 10 files Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-01-26 21:29 -0500
                Re: The first 10 files Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2013-01-26 21:56 -0500
                Re: The first 10 files Jim Janney <jjanney@shell.xmission.com> - 2013-01-26 20:51 -0700
                Re: The first 10 files Jim Janney <jjanney@shell.xmission.com> - 2013-01-26 20:47 -0700
              Re: The first 10 files Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom2@eastlink.ca> - 2013-01-26 22:02 -0400
                Re: The first 10 files Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-01-26 21:35 -0500
                Re: The first 10 files Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-01-26 21:43 -0500
                Re: The first 10 files Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2013-01-27 13:55 +0100
                Re: The first 10 files Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-02-24 17:50 -0500
                Re: The first 10 files Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2013-02-25 21:53 +0100
                Re: The first 10 files Jim Janney <jjanney@shell.xmission.com> - 2013-01-26 20:57 -0700
                Re: The first 10 files Wojtek <nowhere@a.com> - 2013-01-26 21:20 -0800
                Re: The first 10 files Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom2@eastlink.ca> - 2013-01-27 07:23 -0400
                Re: The first 10 files Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-01-27 20:36 -0500
                Re: The first 10 files Wojtek <nowhere@a.com> - 2013-01-28 16:28 -0800
            Re: The first 10 files Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-01-26 21:23 -0500
            Re: The first 10 files Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2013-01-26 19:09 -0800
  Re: The first 10 files Jim Janney <jjanney@shell.xmission.com> - 2013-01-26 16:00 -0700
  Re: The first 10 files Knute Johnson <nospam@knutejohnson.com> - 2013-01-26 18:37 -0800
    Re: The first 10 files Wojtek <nowhere@a.com> - 2013-03-14 03:07 -0700
      Re: The first 10 files lipska the kat <"nospam at neversurrender dot co dot uk"> - 2013-03-14 12:49 +0000
      Re: The first 10 files Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2013-03-15 11:38 +0100
        Re: The first 10 files Wojtek <nowhere@a.com> - 2013-03-15 10:31 -0700

csiph-web