Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #9734
| From | Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Applet Question |
| Date | 2011-11-07 02:50 -0800 |
| Organization | Canadian Mind Products |
| Message-ID | <tidfb7ppkg3pakfpth7qbtkqmlrlupe5kr@4ax.com> (permalink) |
| References | <Xns9F8A8E4E54BE8jpnasty@94.75.214.39> <4eb6ec06$0$284$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <j96r07$s2a$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
On Sun, 06 Nov 2011 14:34:18 -0600, "Nasser M. Abbasi" <nma@12000.org> wrote, quoted or indirectly quoted someone who said : >Anything close to the above using Javascript? I am baffled by the appeal of JavaScript. I find it being used on the web to write code that works with only one browser. I believe it has no sandbox, so it is beloved of websites that want to install Trojans. It is passed around in fluffy text form. It is not OO. Read up on how you write extensions to browsers, email programs, IDEs and the like. Instead of using some sane language like Java, they either concoct some ad hoc monstrosity, or use JavaScript. What are they thinking? Java has one major drawback. The run time takes a long time to load, so browsers procrastinate. This gives the impression that Java itself in painfully slow. Perhaps if it got lazily but most of the time pre-emptively loaded that problem would go away. Google uses JavaScript for its ads. The damn things often take minutes to load, while the fool browser refuses to get on with rendering the page. I have plans in the works to use macros to temporarily remove them while compose, and insert them at the last second before upload. However that does help my visitors any. I written to Google asking them to implement their ads in a way that will not hang browsers. They did not respond. -- Roedy Green Canadian Mind Products http://mindprod.com Capitalism has spurred the competition that makes CPUs faster and faster each year, but the focus on money makes software manufacturers do some peculiar things like deliberately leaving bugs and deficiencies in the software so they can soak the customers for upgrades later. Whether software is easy to use, or never loses data, when the company has a near monopoly, is almost irrelevant to profits, and therefore ignored. The manufacturer focuses on cheap gimicks like dancing paper clips to dazzle naive first-time buyers. The needs of existing experienced users are almost irrelevant. I see software rental as the best remedy.
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: Applet Question Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-11-06 15:20 -0500
Re: Applet Question "Nasser M. Abbasi" <nma@12000.org> - 2011-11-06 14:34 -0600
Re: Applet Question Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-11-06 15:41 -0500
Re: Applet Question Paul Cager <paul.cager@googlemail.com> - 2011-11-07 08:21 -0800
Re: Applet Question Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-11-07 02:50 -0800
Re: Applet Question Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-11-07 17:11 -0500
Re: Applet Question Andrew Thompson <andrewthommo@gmail.com> - 2011-11-08 03:25 -0800
Re: Applet Question "Nasser M. Abbasi" <nma@12000.org> - 2011-11-09 15:23 -0600
Re: Applet Question Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-11-09 20:21 -0500
csiph-web