Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #10483
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
|---|---|
| From | Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> |
| Subject | Re: case insensitive sort |
| References | <nfvoc7t69mjhbed81u75k9v1j1nn4pcu73@4ax.com> <4ed04e65$0$289$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <slrnjd1tig.fvg.avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> <4ed98ff7$0$291$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> |
| Message-ID | <slrnjdmjnd.fvg.avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> (permalink) |
| Date | 2011-12-04 10:43 +0000 |
Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> wrote: > On 11/26/2011 9:23 AM, Andreas Leitgeb wrote: >> Arne Vajhøj<arne@vajhoej.dk> wrote: >>> On 11/23/2011 12:06 AM, Roedy Green wrote: >>>> When someone asks for a case insensitive sort, they typically use code >>>> like this in the Comparator >>>> return a.x.compareToIgnoreCase( b.x ); >>>> However than will not give you what you really want. You probably >>>> want this if you want tidy-looking results. >>>> int diff = a.x.compareToIgnoreCase( b ); >>>> if ( diff != 0 ) return diff; >>>> return a.x.compareTo( b.x ); >>> Assuming that whoever asked for a case insensitive sort did not mean >>> it but wanted a case insensitive sort with those case insensitive equal >>> sorted case sensitive. >> Which I consider a pretty safe bet in practise. >> From a javadoc-link quickly googled: >> " It is strongly recommended (though not required) that natural orderings be >> " consistent with equals. [...] >> This is just another example of where a comparability based only on >> compareNoCase is likely a bad thing. > Hm. > I read it as if you should also override equals. It surely depends on what the things are, that are being sorted. You might want to sort items case-insensitively, which may have a unique case-sensitive identity. (e.g. filenames on c.s. filesystems) That's where Roedy's suggestion fits best, imho.
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
case insensitive sort Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-11-22 21:06 -0800
Re: case insensitive sort Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-11-22 21:59 -0800
Re: case insensitive sort v_borchert@despammed.com (Volker Borchert) - 2011-11-23 06:34 +0000
Re: case insensitive sort Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-11-23 02:49 -0800
Re: case insensitive sort Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-11-23 02:46 -0800
Re: case insensitive sort Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-11-23 05:23 -0800
Re: case insensitive sort v_borchert@despammed.com (Volker Borchert) - 2011-11-23 19:32 +0000
Re: case insensitive sort dibs <dibs@dobs.dabs> - 2011-11-23 15:11 -0500
Re: case insensitive sort v_borchert@despammed.com (Volker Borchert) - 2011-11-24 05:03 +0000
Re: case insensitive sort Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-11-25 21:26 -0500
Re: case insensitive sort Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-11-26 14:23 +0000
Re: case insensitive sort Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-12-02 21:56 -0500
Re: case insensitive sort Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-12-04 10:43 +0000
csiph-web