Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #7221

Re: enhance an array's static type by a lower length-bound.

Path csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!newsfeed.utanet.at!newscore.univie.ac.at!aconews-feed.univie.ac.at!aconews.univie.ac.at!not-for-mail
Newsgroups comp.lang.java.programmer
From Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at>
Subject Re: enhance an array's static type by a lower length-bound.
References <slrnj4nm33.6gl.avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> <j2gu2q$2tm$1@dont-email.me> <slrnj4q40p.6gl.avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> <j2jb67$492$1@dont-email.me>
Reply-To avl@logic.at
User-Agent slrn/pre0.9.9-111 (Linux)
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
Message-ID <slrnj4qlh6.6gl.avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> (permalink)
Date 18 Aug 2011 18:12:54 GMT
Lines 23
NNTP-Posting-Host gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at
X-Trace 1313691174 tunews.univie.ac.at 71616 128.130.175.3
X-Complaints-To abuse@tuwien.ac.at
Xref x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:7221

Show key headers only | View raw


Joshua Cranmer <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> wrote:
> On 8/18/2011 8:14 AM, Andreas Leitgeb wrote:
>> Joshua Cranmer<Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid>  wrote:
>>> On 8/17/2011 10:04 AM, Andreas Leitgeb wrote:
>>>> I believe such a change would be source-compatible, but might require
>>>> some severe changes at the bytecode/class-file-format level, to allow
>>>> to specify such a lower bound in a type signature. Such a change should
>>>> be possible in a way, that old class-files can still be used. e.g.:
>>>>    get9th:(]10I)I    (currently without bounds:  get9th:([I)I )
>>> You could do it by adding a few new annotations,
>> I must admit, that I've so far mostly ignored Annotations for my
>> tasks. When you write "adding a few annotations", do you just mean
>> adding certain standard annotations to the respective places, or did
>> you mean defining a custom Annotation and write some code for a
>> compiler-plugin that would then deal with one's new Annotations?

> I was actually referring to class file annotations, not Java annotations.

They are called "annotations", too?  I thought, they were called "attributes".

But anyway, yes, that might also be a way to implement it.
(That's also, how signatures of generic methods, etc. are handled)

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

enhance an array's static type by a lower length-bound. Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-08-17 15:04 +0000
  Re: enhance an array's static type by a lower length-bound. Joshua Cranmer <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> - 2011-08-17 12:34 -0500
    Re: enhance an array's static type by a lower length-bound. Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-08-18 13:14 +0000
      Re: enhance an array's static type by a lower length-bound. Joshua Cranmer <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> - 2011-08-18 10:30 -0500
        Re: enhance an array's static type by a lower length-bound. Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-08-18 18:12 +0000
          Re: enhance an array's static type by a lower length-bound. Joshua Cranmer <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> - 2011-08-18 20:59 -0500
  Re: enhance an array's static type by a lower length-bound. Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-08-17 20:42 +0200
    Re: enhance an array's static type by a lower length-bound. Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-08-18 21:44 +0000
      Re: enhance an array's static type by a lower length-bound. Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-08-19 13:24 +0200
        Re: enhance an array's static type by a lower length-bound. Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-08-20 17:20 +0000
  Re: enhance an array's static type by a lower length-bound. Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-08-17 22:11 -0700
    Re: enhance an array's static type by a lower length-bound. Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-08-17 23:17 -0700
      Re: enhance an array's static type by a lower length-bound. Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-08-18 10:41 +0000
        Re: enhance an array's static type by a lower length-bound. Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-08-18 06:34 -0700
          Re: enhance an array's static type by a lower length-bound. Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-08-18 18:08 +0000
            Re: enhance an array's static type by a lower length-bound. Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-08-18 17:53 -0700
              Re: enhance an array's static type by a lower length-bound. Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-08-20 17:31 +0000
                Re: enhance an array's static type by a lower length-bound. Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-08-20 10:50 -0700
                Re: enhance an array's static type by a lower length-bound. Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-08-21 10:47 +0200
          Re: enhance an array's static type by a lower length-bound. Michal Kleczek <kleku@poczta.onet.pl> - 2011-08-21 20:27 +0200

csiph-web