Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #25994

Re: Why “new”?

Newsgroups	comp.lang.java.programmer
From	Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at>
Subject	Re: Why “new”?
References	(16 earlier) <slrnil53lk.nej.avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> <iiu4br$1q1$1@news.albasani.net> <slrnil5br5.nej.avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> <e7a1a5dc-dda1-496c-8fa4-d7431b646d3c@i39g2000prd.googlegroups.com> <ea6f0780-e3e4-43fd-8af3-6028f50e3b22@n2g2000pre.googlegroups.com>
Message-ID	<slrnil5u73.nej.avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> (permalink)
Date	2011-02-09 20:28 +0000

Show all headers | View raw

Lew <lew@lewscanon.com> wrote:
> Oh, I see my mistake.  I was talking aobut the time he took to google,
> and y'all were talking about how long it took him to get an answer on
> Usenet.

Indeed.  You see, even a small misreading may lead to uttered
conclusions, that may make one appear utterly faulty at logic...

Perhaps you all remember that next time, when someone posts
what looks like utter bullshit - it may easily have been just
a small misunderstanding somewhere before.

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: Why “new”? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-02-08 23:08 -0500
  Re: Why “new”? Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-02-09 08:21 -0500
    Re: Why “new”? Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-02-09 15:14 +0000
      Re: Why “new”? Lew <lew@lewscanon.com> - 2011-02-09 10:02 -0800
        Re: Why “new”? Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-02-09 20:28 +0000
          Re: Why “new”? Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-02-09 18:34 -0500
  Re: Why “new”? Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-02-09 12:55 +0000

csiph-web