Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #38738

Re: java still worthwhile?

Path csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid>
Newsgroups comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject Re: java still worthwhile?
Date Wed, 27 Feb 2019 15:36:30 +0100
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Lines 9
Message-ID <q5679j$5jp$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References <c113te.fnr.17.1@news.alt.net> <q54ghl$ivg$1@news.albasani.net> <c1185f.vne.17.1@news.alt.net> <q54lcj$79u$1@news.albasani.net>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
Injection-Date Wed, 27 Feb 2019 14:36:35 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="8233592c88b1590253d47c816ed65e0e"; logging-data="5753"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18LMb5q9GBYC2yzttBW8RjZ"
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.5.1
Cancel-Lock sha1:rqwXc0UUE/DnHx3lv3nzmsVdmCE=
In-Reply-To <q54lcj$79u$1@news.albasani.net>
X-Antivirus-Status Clean
Content-Language en-US
X-Antivirus AVG (VPS 190227-0, 02/27/2019), Outbound message
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:38738

Show key headers only | View raw


On 2019-02-27 01:24, Martin Gregorie wrote:
> Writing trace output to a circular buffer that only 
> gets dumped at a crash or fatal error is also good for long-running 
> processes

Much agreed. Out of curiosity, how do you handle the trigger?

-- 
DF.

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

java still worthwhile? dale <dale@dalekelly.org> - 2019-02-26 17:25 -0500
  Re: java still worthwhile? dale <dale@dalekelly.org> - 2019-02-26 18:37 -0500
    Re: java still worthwhile? Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2019-02-27 15:36 +0100
      Re: java still worthwhile? Martin Gregorie <martin@mydomain.invalid> - 2019-02-27 20:33 +0000
        Re: java still worthwhile? Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2019-02-28 23:16 +0100
          Re: java still worthwhile? Martin Gregorie <martin@mydomain.invalid> - 2019-02-28 23:24 +0000
  Re: java still worthwhile? Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2019-02-27 07:28 -0500
    Re: java still worthwhile? dale <dale@dalekelly.org> - 2019-02-27 09:32 -0500
  Re: java still worthwhile? Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2019-02-27 05:18 -0800
    Re: java still worthwhile? dale <dale@dalekelly.org> - 2019-02-27 16:34 -0500
  Re: java still worthwhile? Joerg Meier <joergmmeier@arcor.de> - 2019-03-01 11:10 +0100
    Re: java still worthwhile? dale <dale@dalekelly.org> - 2019-03-01 10:11 -0500
      Re: java still worthwhile? Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2019-03-01 07:22 -0800
        Re: java still worthwhile? dale <dale@dalekelly.org> - 2019-03-01 13:34 -0500
      Re: java still worthwhile? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2019-03-01 22:07 -0500
      Re: java still worthwhile? Joerg Meier <joergmmeier@arcor.de> - 2019-03-05 09:40 +0100
        Re: java still worthwhile? dale <dale@dalekelly.org> - 2019-03-05 09:33 -0500
  Re: java still worthwhile? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2019-03-01 22:09 -0500

csiph-web