Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #38717
| From | Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Current JDK landscape? |
| Date | 2019-01-27 19:07 -0500 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <q2lh4p$4c2$2@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <deef4b27-f0dd-4480-9dc7-7f597d6974b1@googlegroups.com> <5c4e067a$0$10625$e4fe514c@newszilla.xs4all.nl> <q2lgg9$8hf$1@news.albasani.net> |
On 1/27/2019 6:56 PM, Martin Gregorie wrote: > On Sun, 27 Jan 2019 20:28:58 +0100, Silvio wrote: > >> On 27-01-19 17:16, bursejan@gmail.com wrote: >>> Anybody experience with: >>> >>> #LibericaJDK https://www.bell-sw.com/java.html ? >>> >>> >> Why does this even exist? I don't see the point. > > With the (lack of) information and links to descriptive pages on its > download page I'm unable to decide if it has a point. > > If its download page described what it does, e.g. Javadocs for the > packages/classes it supplies and what problems they are meant to solve, This OpenJDK build probably solve the same problems as other OpenJDK builds. > that would be a lot more helpful than simply stating that its 'for > Docker'. It is available in many forms including Docker, but also MSI, ZIP, DMG, DEB and TAR.GZ. Arne
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Current JDK landscape? bursejan@gmail.com - 2019-01-27 08:16 -0800
Re: Current JDK landscape? Silvio <silvio@internet.com> - 2019-01-27 20:28 +0100
Re: Current JDK landscape? Martin Gregorie <martin@mydomain.invalid> - 2019-01-27 23:56 +0000
Re: Current JDK landscape? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2019-01-27 19:07 -0500
Re: Current JDK landscape? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2019-01-27 19:04 -0500
csiph-web