Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #38717

Re: Current JDK landscape?

From Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk>
Newsgroups comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject Re: Current JDK landscape?
Date 2019-01-27 19:07 -0500
Organization Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID <q2lh4p$4c2$2@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References <deef4b27-f0dd-4480-9dc7-7f597d6974b1@googlegroups.com> <5c4e067a$0$10625$e4fe514c@newszilla.xs4all.nl> <q2lgg9$8hf$1@news.albasani.net>

Show all headers | View raw


On 1/27/2019 6:56 PM, Martin Gregorie wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Jan 2019 20:28:58 +0100, Silvio wrote:
> 
>> On 27-01-19 17:16, bursejan@gmail.com wrote:
>>> Anybody experience with:
>>>
>>> #LibericaJDK https://www.bell-sw.com/java.html ?
>>>
>>>
>> Why does this even exist? I don't see the point.
> 
> With the (lack of) information and links to descriptive pages on its
> download page I'm unable to decide if it has a point.
> 
> If its download page described what it does, e.g. Javadocs for the
> packages/classes it supplies and what problems they are meant to solve,

This OpenJDK build probably solve the same problems as other
OpenJDK builds.

> that would be a lot more helpful than simply stating that its 'for
> Docker'.

It is available in many forms including Docker, but also
MSI, ZIP, DMG, DEB and TAR.GZ.

Arne

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Current JDK landscape? bursejan@gmail.com - 2019-01-27 08:16 -0800
  Re: Current JDK landscape? Silvio <silvio@internet.com> - 2019-01-27 20:28 +0100
    Re: Current JDK landscape? Martin Gregorie <martin@mydomain.invalid> - 2019-01-27 23:56 +0000
      Re: Current JDK landscape? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2019-01-27 19:07 -0500
    Re: Current JDK landscape? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2019-01-27 19:04 -0500

csiph-web