Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #11717

Re: Converting Sets

From Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid>
Newsgroups comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject Re: Converting Sets
Date 2012-02-02 16:29 -0800
Organization Canadian Mind Products
Message-ID <p29mi7hc3v300i0au9brcs0hnbuf1dapgs@4ax.com> (permalink)
References <11fki7dcr12je80bqi6q7ml6f0tc78965a@4ax.com> <4f2a767d$0$449$426a34cc@news.free.fr> <vq3li79bbkel9maksor8n63m6jr5pgsq5q@4ax.com> <4f2aa4fe$0$6897$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <jgegmb$gqc$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw


On Thu, 02 Feb 2012 09:21:13 -0800, markspace <-@.> wrote, quoted or
indirectly quoted someone who said :

>I think this is covered in Effective Java.  Generics are a compile time 
>thing

Everything else in Java eventually seems obvious.  Generics on the
other hand get weirder and weirder the more I learn.  I think it was a
mistake to try to do generics purely at compile time.  It is like
trying to do all types purely at compile time.

Have  we gone down that road too far now that Java can never be fixed
with run-time generics info without starting over with some completely
different notation? Then serialisation could work, containers could be
allocated with the precise array type.  You would not have so much
under-the-hood casting.

Perhaps it is time to read-read all the generics docs and see if they
make more sense now with some practical experience under my belt.
-- 
Roedy Green Canadian Mind Products
http://mindprod.com
One of the most useful comments you can put in a program is 
"If you change this, remember to change ?XXX? too".
 

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Converting Sets Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-02-01 23:34 -0800
  Re: Converting Sets Mayeul <mayeul.marguet@free.fr> - 2012-02-02 12:47 +0100
    Re: Converting Sets Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-02-02 05:32 -0800
      Re: Converting Sets Mayeul <mayeul.marguet@free.fr> - 2012-02-02 16:06 +0100
        Re: Converting Sets markspace <-@.> - 2012-02-02 09:21 -0800
          Re: Converting Sets Jim Janney <jjanney@shell.xmission.com> - 2012-02-02 13:13 -0700
            Re: Converting Sets markspace <-@.> - 2012-02-02 13:46 -0800
          Re: Converting Sets Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-02-02 16:29 -0800
            Re: Converting Sets Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-02-02 17:34 -0800
              Re: Converting Sets Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-02-04 20:49 -0500
                Re: Converting Sets Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-02-06 12:55 -0800
                Re: Converting Sets Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-02-06 20:47 -0500
                Re: Converting Sets Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-02-06 17:51 -0800
                Re: Converting Sets Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-02-06 20:57 -0500
            Re: Converting Sets markspace <-@.> - 2012-02-03 14:12 -0800
              Re: Converting Sets Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-02-03 22:32 -0800
            Re: Converting Sets Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-02-03 22:30 -0800
          Re: Converting Sets Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-02-03 22:33 -0800
      Re: Converting Sets Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-02-02 11:02 -0800
    Re: Converting Sets Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-02-02 18:25 -0800
      Re: Converting Sets markspace <-@.> - 2012-02-03 14:25 -0800

csiph-web