Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #11717
| From | Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Converting Sets |
| Date | 2012-02-02 16:29 -0800 |
| Organization | Canadian Mind Products |
| Message-ID | <p29mi7hc3v300i0au9brcs0hnbuf1dapgs@4ax.com> (permalink) |
| References | <11fki7dcr12je80bqi6q7ml6f0tc78965a@4ax.com> <4f2a767d$0$449$426a34cc@news.free.fr> <vq3li79bbkel9maksor8n63m6jr5pgsq5q@4ax.com> <4f2aa4fe$0$6897$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <jgegmb$gqc$1@dont-email.me> |
On Thu, 02 Feb 2012 09:21:13 -0800, markspace <-@.> wrote, quoted or indirectly quoted someone who said : >I think this is covered in Effective Java. Generics are a compile time >thing Everything else in Java eventually seems obvious. Generics on the other hand get weirder and weirder the more I learn. I think it was a mistake to try to do generics purely at compile time. It is like trying to do all types purely at compile time. Have we gone down that road too far now that Java can never be fixed with run-time generics info without starting over with some completely different notation? Then serialisation could work, containers could be allocated with the precise array type. You would not have so much under-the-hood casting. Perhaps it is time to read-read all the generics docs and see if they make more sense now with some practical experience under my belt. -- Roedy Green Canadian Mind Products http://mindprod.com One of the most useful comments you can put in a program is "If you change this, remember to change ?XXX? too".
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Converting Sets Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-02-01 23:34 -0800
Re: Converting Sets Mayeul <mayeul.marguet@free.fr> - 2012-02-02 12:47 +0100
Re: Converting Sets Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-02-02 05:32 -0800
Re: Converting Sets Mayeul <mayeul.marguet@free.fr> - 2012-02-02 16:06 +0100
Re: Converting Sets markspace <-@.> - 2012-02-02 09:21 -0800
Re: Converting Sets Jim Janney <jjanney@shell.xmission.com> - 2012-02-02 13:13 -0700
Re: Converting Sets markspace <-@.> - 2012-02-02 13:46 -0800
Re: Converting Sets Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-02-02 16:29 -0800
Re: Converting Sets Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-02-02 17:34 -0800
Re: Converting Sets Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-02-04 20:49 -0500
Re: Converting Sets Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-02-06 12:55 -0800
Re: Converting Sets Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-02-06 20:47 -0500
Re: Converting Sets Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-02-06 17:51 -0800
Re: Converting Sets Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-02-06 20:57 -0500
Re: Converting Sets markspace <-@.> - 2012-02-03 14:12 -0800
Re: Converting Sets Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-02-03 22:32 -0800
Re: Converting Sets Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-02-03 22:30 -0800
Re: Converting Sets Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-02-03 22:33 -0800
Re: Converting Sets Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-02-02 11:02 -0800
Re: Converting Sets Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-02-02 18:25 -0800
Re: Converting Sets markspace <-@.> - 2012-02-03 14:25 -0800
csiph-web