Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #20955

Re: Why is that in JDK8: value used in lambda expression shuld be effectively final?

Path	csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From	Steven Simpson <ss@domain.invalid>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject	Re: Why is that in JDK8: value used in lambda expression shuld be effectively final?
Date	Fri, 04 Jan 2013 21:32:38 +0000
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Lines	14
Message-ID	<mcujr9-dfs.ln1@s.simpson148.btinternet.com> (permalink)
References	<c885bedb-977c-49b4-a10a-b9cdd3df1dd9@googlegroups.com> <m0sdr9-0tg.ln1@s.simpson148.btinternet.com> <9f030e71-96ab-4ead-9690-4369f4a19aa9@googlegroups.com> <pk7er9-i4j.ln1@s.simpson148.btinternet.com> <d6fdb884-3181-4b37-a011-6da19e649758@googlegroups.com> <odmer9-onl.ln1@s.simpson148.btinternet.com> <0680c1e0-16cb-4791-8a5f-95a3ff2bcba8@googlegroups.com> <fa166a9f-b0ed-4eba-9789-97ef2f67923a@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
Injection-Info	mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="0d771e3708e29ef01409ed69429633ae"; logging-data="2947"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/kdMCRLIb8TUvy7vYWoDnwSCnBQhTpoPk="
User-Agent	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0
In-Reply-To	<fa166a9f-b0ed-4eba-9789-97ef2f67923a@googlegroups.com>
Cancel-Lock	sha1:OhkXZDTNkswyYFzw/ty/jtoo3fg=
Xref	csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:20955

Show key headers only | View raw

On 03/01/13 14:45, Saxo wrote:
> http://objectscape.blogspot.de/2013/01/jdk8-lambdas-as-restrictive-as.html

I'm still interested in seeing an example that you would normally write 
with free variables, demonstrating that lambdas are inadequate for the 
things you'd like to do.  The example you provided of summing integers 
has two alternatives, so it only serves to show that free variables are 
not possible, not that free variables are necessary.

Can you contrive something more sophisticated, as an exercise?

-- 
ss at comp dot lancs dot ac dot uk

Thread

Re: Why is that in JDK8: value used in lambda expression shuld be effectively final? jeti789@web.de - 2013-01-02 07:08 -0800
  Re: Why is that in JDK8: value used in lambda expression shuld be effectively final? jeti789@web.de - 2013-01-02 07:52 -0800
  Re: Why is that in JDK8: value used in lambda expression shuld be effectively final? Steven Simpson <ss@domain.invalid> - 2013-01-02 17:33 +0000
    Re: Why is that in JDK8: value used in lambda expression shuld be effectively final? Saxo <jeti789@web.de> - 2013-01-02 11:31 -0800
      Re: Why is that in JDK8: value used in lambda expression shuld be effectively final? Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2013-01-02 12:52 -0800
        Re: Why is that in JDK8: value used in lambda expression shuld be effectively final? Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom2@eastlink.ca> - 2013-01-02 20:58 -0400
          Re: Why is that in JDK8: value used in lambda expression shuld be effectively final? Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2013-01-02 17:40 -0800
            Re: Why is that in JDK8: value used in lambda expression shuld be effectively final? Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom2@eastlink.ca> - 2013-01-03 20:43 -0400
        Re: Why is that in JDK8: value used in lambda expression shuld be effectively final? Saxo <jeti789@web.de> - 2013-01-02 23:44 -0800
          Re: Why is that in JDK8: value used in lambda expression shuld be effectively final? Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2013-01-03 07:57 -0800
            Re: Why is that in JDK8: value used in lambda expression shuld be effectively final? Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2013-01-03 13:22 -0800
              Re: Why is that in JDK8: value used in lambda expression shuld be effectively final? Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2013-01-03 16:14 -0800
      Re: Why is that in JDK8: value used in lambda expression shuld be effectively final? Steven Simpson <ss@domain.invalid> - 2013-01-02 21:46 +0000
        Re: Why is that in JDK8: value used in lambda expression shuld be effectively final? Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2013-01-02 17:35 -0800
        Re: Why is that in JDK8: value used in lambda expression shuld be effectively final? Saxo <jeti789@web.de> - 2013-01-03 02:13 -0800
          Re: Why is that in JDK8: value used in lambda expression shuld be effectively final? Saxo <jeti789@web.de> - 2013-01-03 06:45 -0800
            Re: Why is that in JDK8: value used in lambda expression shuld be effectively final? Steven Simpson <ss@domain.invalid> - 2013-01-04 21:32 +0000
              Re: Why is that in JDK8: value used in lambda expression shuld be effectively final? Peter Duniho <NpOeStPeAdM@NnOwSlPiAnMk.com> - 2013-01-04 14:38 -0800
                Re: Why is that in JDK8: value used in lambda expression shuld be effectively final? Steven Simpson <ss@domain.invalid> - 2013-01-04 23:45 +0000
                Re: Why is that in JDK8: value used in lambda expression shuld be effectively final? Peter Duniho <NpOeStPeAdM@NnOwSlPiAnMk.com> - 2013-01-04 17:24 -0800
                Re: Why is that in JDK8: value used in lambda expression shuld be effectively final? Steven Simpson <ss@domain.invalid> - 2013-01-05 13:20 +0000
              Re: Why is that in JDK8: value used in lambda expression shuld be effectively final? Saxo <jeti789@web.de> - 2013-01-05 01:50 -0800
                Re: Why is that in JDK8: value used in lambda expression shuld be effectively final? Steven Simpson <ss@domain.invalid> - 2013-01-05 11:21 +0000
                Re: Why is that in JDK8: value used in lambda expression shuld be effectively final? Saxo <jeti789@web.de> - 2013-01-05 04:27 -0800
                Re: Why is that in JDK8: value used in lambda expression shuld be effectively final? Steven Simpson <ss@domain.invalid> - 2013-01-05 12:58 +0000

csiph-web