Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #21683

Re: unused statics?

Path	csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!news.glorb.com!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date	Thu, 24 Jan 2013 19:38:11 -0600
Date	Thu, 24 Jan 2013 17:38:12 -0800
From	Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org>
User-Agent	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0
MIME-Version	1.0
Newsgroups	comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject	Re: unused statics?
References	<263f14ba-8542-4ec5-9e23-0a91da46e62d@googlegroups.com> <8cfbd2b9-1941-45d1-865b-1a7b5f9c515e@googlegroups.com> <51019d7f$0$291$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <oaSdnUTRN-cXOZzMnZ2dnUVZ_sKdnZ2d@earthlink.com> <5101bec0$0$283$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <8b069e2e-93d3-4356-b2ae-23408c392228@googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To	<8b069e2e-93d3-4356-b2ae-23408c392228@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding	8bit
Message-ID	<mISdnV2-y6Cef5zMnZ2dnUVZ_jSdnZ2d@earthlink.com> (permalink)
Lines	21
X-Usenet-Provider	http://www.giganews.com
NNTP-Posting-Host	70.230.205.210
X-Trace	sv3-lM7QpqHTKS9pUGznaOM/SiTZe6QMBdZ3NK5hrNpIW8qFIO1UHH//sUBvR59fKMhGTUJUvC+2EbfNn02!tyvQIqW64e1vLqOEvyOntUNXaKIUfaM3gSheu+E0BBqlHmH51k5dQhonTDN4z0VUxElwdal3mun7!oAsIC3bCNBag25xRug8A4kCQ9NSEx8Cd6X47H38S9IzI4cs=
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info	Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info	Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter	1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes	2145
Xref	csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:21683

Show key headers only | View raw

On 1/24/2013 5:16 PM, Lew wrote:
> Arne Vajhøj wrote:
>> Patricia Shanahan wrote:
>>> Arne Vajhï¿½j wrote:
>>>> Lew wrote:
>>>>> Why was it assigned its default value redundantly?
>>>> Sometimes it improves readability.
>
> Not this time. Was it the OP's intention? Why not let the OP answer?
>
>>> I often do that as a note to myself. It means I do expect to use the
>
> Was that the OP's intention? Why not let the OP answer?
...

Huh? You seem to have forgotten some basics of how newsgroups work. I
don't have to "let" the OP answer. I could not prevent the OP from
answering even if I wanted to do so. On the other hand, I am equally
free to express my opinions on the subject.

Patricia

Thread

unused statics? bob smith <bob@coolfone.comze.com> - 2013-01-24 12:23 -0800
  Re: unused statics? Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2013-01-24 12:31 -0800
    Re: unused statics? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-01-24 15:45 -0500
      Re: unused statics? Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2013-01-24 13:15 -0800
        Re: unused statics? markspace <markspace@nospam.nospam> - 2013-01-24 13:54 -0800
        Re: unused statics? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-01-24 18:07 -0500
          Re: unused statics? Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2013-01-24 17:16 -0800
            Re: unused statics? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-01-24 20:31 -0500
              Re: unused statics? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-01-24 20:35 -0500
            Re: unused statics? Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2013-01-24 17:38 -0800
            Re: unused statics? Magnus Warker <magnus@mailinator.com> - 2013-01-25 05:29 +0100
            Re: unused statics? lipska the kat <"nospam at neversurrender dot co dot uk"> - 2013-01-25 08:42 +0000
          Re: unused statics? Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> - 2013-01-25 09:36 -0800
            Re: unused statics? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-02-24 17:55 -0500
  Re: unused statics? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-01-24 15:43 -0500
  Re: unused statics? Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2013-01-26 02:53 -0800
    Re: unused statics? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-01-26 16:37 -0500

csiph-web