Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #24097

Re: A JavaScript setTimeout() even canNOT interrupt a currently executing setTomeout() event!

Path csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!news.etla.org!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From Richard Maher <maher_rjSPAMLESS@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.javascript, comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject Re: A JavaScript setTimeout() even canNOT interrupt a currently executing setTomeout() event!
Date Thu, 16 May 2013 19:14:41 +0800
Organization Aioe.org NNTP Server
Lines 38
Message-ID <kn2f31$kat$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink)
References <kn070t$dl$1@speranza.aioe.org> <kn0b3r$e5o$1@dont-email.me>
NNTP-Posting-Host jOhPn0KFjrxwuMc9OPMmCw.user.speranza.aioe.org
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-Complaints-To abuse@aioe.org
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6
X-Notice Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.javascript:19763 comp.lang.java.programmer:24097

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw


On 5/15/2013 11:58 PM, markspace wrote:
> On 5/15/2013 7:44 AM, Richard Maher wrote:
>> If, like me, you hold this truth to be self-evident then please bring
>> your pitch-fork to the castle door of: -
>
> No.

You're not much fun then. So the torch is out of the question?
>
>> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=856969#c44
>>
>> (Java/Liveconnect is the facilitator)
>>
>> Is it a GTK, Geko, Windows issue?
>
> I followed a bit from the last post you made on this issue, and I'm
> pretty sure the issue is not GTK, Geko, or Windows, but in the general
> vicinity of your chair.

Look, you're most probably correct but it's just that ALL the WebKit 
browsers behave and do what they should and even *FireFox* on OS/X is 
unbreakable with my example. (Regardless of setTimeout()s, 
Thread.Sleep()s, and the number of JS Tester() objects.

I bet my right gonad that no one here can *SHOW* me otherwise!
>
> They're being very nice and explaining why the issue exists and cannot
> be changed.

Some of the nicest, high-calibre, selfless people I've met in IT! If 
they could just tell me why FireFox OS/X doesn't miss a beat then I'll 
go away a happy man.

> You have to change your own code.  It's the only way.
>
>
>
Looks that way. I can deal with that.

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

A JavaScript setTimeout() even canNOT interrupt a currently executing setTomeout() event! Richard Maher <maher_rjSPAMLESS@hotmail.com> - 2013-05-15 22:44 +0800
  Re: A JavaScript setTimeout() even canNOT interrupt a currently executing setTomeout() event! markspace <markspace@nospam.nospam> - 2013-05-15 08:58 -0700
    Re: A JavaScript setTimeout() even canNOT interrupt a currently executing setTomeout() event! Richard Maher <maher_rjSPAMLESS@hotmail.com> - 2013-05-16 19:14 +0800
      Re: A JavaScript setTimeout() even canNOT interrupt a currently executing setTomeout() event! markspace <markspace@nospam.nospam> - 2013-05-16 07:44 -0700
  Re: A JavaScript setTimeout() even canNOT interrupt a currently executing setTomeout() event! "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2013-05-16 00:01 +0200
    Re: A JavaScript setTimeout() even canNOT interrupt a currently executing setTomeout() event! Richard Maher <maher_rjSPAMLESS@hotmail.com> - 2013-05-16 19:02 +0800

csiph-web