Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #21970
| From | Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: String.substring in JDK 1.7.0_6+ |
| Date | 2013-02-01 20:34 +0100 |
| Organization | albasani.net |
| Message-ID | <keh5bl$kq8$1@news.albasani.net> (permalink) |
| References | <510c0a6a$0$8985$ba4acef3@reader.news.orange.fr> |
There seems to be more going on with Strings: http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6962931 But I didn't find the original change request (CR) or request for enhancement concerning the copy semantics. There was some estimate on applications impact and allotment for redesigning applications. I didn't know about hash32 thing in the link below. Your micro benchmark doesn't test hashCode, does it? jlp schrieb: > The String class was modified in JDK 1.7.0_6. > String.substring that was 0(1) before JDK 1.7.0_6, now becomes O(n) > > All is well explained at : > http://java-performance.info/changes-to-string-java-1-7-0_06/ > > I wrote a small test: > https://gist.github.com/4692960 > > java -Xms128M -Xmx128M teststring.Main 100000 1000000 > > On my desktop: > jdk 1.7.0_11 => 33 seconds / 252 KBytes Memory > jdk 1.6.0_38 => 25 milliseconds / 782 KBytes Memory > more than 1000 times faster ! ( Ok! for this stupid test ;-) ) > > I don't think it is a good improvement ! Uses less memory, but you > retrieve it, when the object is garbaged > What do you think about this ? >
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
String.substring in JDK 1.7.0_6+ jlp <jlp@jlp.com> - 2013-02-01 19:33 +0100
Re: String.substring in JDK 1.7.0_6+ markspace <markspace@nospam.nospam> - 2013-02-01 10:38 -0800
Re: String.substring in JDK 1.7.0_6+ jlp <jlp@jlp.com> - 2013-02-01 19:42 +0100
Re: String.substring in JDK 1.7.0_6+ markspace <markspace@nospam.nospam> - 2013-02-01 10:45 -0800
Re: String.substring in JDK 1.7.0_6+ jlp <jlp@jlp.com> - 2013-02-01 19:57 +0100
Re: String.substring in JDK 1.7.0_6+ markspace <markspace@nospam.nospam> - 2013-02-01 11:20 -0800
Re: String.substring in JDK 1.7.0_6+ Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2013-02-01 20:34 +0100
Re: String.substring in JDK 1.7.0_6+ Kevin McMurtrie <mcmurtrie@pixelmemory.us> - 2013-02-01 20:58 -0800
Re: String.substring in JDK 1.7.0_6+ markspace <markspace@nospam.nospam> - 2013-02-01 22:55 -0800
Re: String.substring in JDK 1.7.0_6+ Kevin McMurtrie <mcmurtrie@pixelmemory.us> - 2013-02-02 08:43 -0800
Re: String.substring in JDK 1.7.0_6+ markspace <markspace@nospam.nospam> - 2013-02-02 10:56 -0800
Re: String.substring in JDK 1.7.0_6+ Kevin McMurtrie <mcmurtrie@pixelmemory.us> - 2013-02-02 14:46 -0800
Re: String.substring in JDK 1.7.0_6+ markspace <markspace@nospam.nospam> - 2013-02-02 15:31 -0800
Re: String.substring in JDK 1.7.0_6+ Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2013-02-03 15:09 +0100
csiph-web