Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #21449
| From | Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Javadoc rethinking? |
| Date | 2013-01-16 22:11 +0000 |
| Organization | UK Free Software Network |
| Message-ID | <kd78ja$7cm$2@localhost.localdomain> (permalink) |
| References | <3b10d0bb-0307-4365-b762-d619fd3c608b@googlegroups.com> <50f6cebb$0$285$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <kd71nq$5p4$1@localhost.localdomain> |
On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 20:14:50 +0000, Martin Gregorie wrote: > On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 11:00:58 -0500, Arne Vajhøj wrote: > >> On 1/16/2013 10:38 AM, bob smith wrote: >>> Am I the only one who thinks that maybe there ought to be some >>> improvements to the Javadoc process? >>> >>> I was just looking at a Javadoc for a DatePickerDialog, and it seemed >>> like it was missing something… that something was an image of an >>> example of the dialog. I think that would have been very helpful. >>> >>> However, Javadocs don't support images, and it is not necessarily good >>> for the crucial documentation to be mingled with the code. >> >> JavaDoc support HTML tags and I would assume they support IMG tag?? >> > Yes, the Javadocs docs say you can put both HTML and images in the doc- > files directory. > > The only I have is that the docs say you should not put a <title> > section in package.html because this causes a conflict with HTML-tidy. > Fortunately, you can ignore this: running "tidy -m ..." generates a > <title> section which does not cause any problems with javadocs - at > least, none that I can see. > Sorry: that should read: "The only niggle I have is that the Javadocs docs say you should not put a <title> section in package.html because this causes a conflict with HTML-tidy." -- martin@ | Martin Gregorie gregorie. | Essex, UK org |
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Javadoc rethinking? bob smith <bob@coolfone.comze.com> - 2013-01-16 07:38 -0800
Re: Javadoc rethinking? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-01-16 11:00 -0500
Re: Javadoc rethinking? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2013-01-16 20:14 +0000
Re: Javadoc rethinking? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2013-01-16 22:11 +0000
Re: Javadoc rethinking? Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2013-01-16 17:00 -0800
Re: Javadoc rethinking? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2013-01-17 01:25 +0000
Re: Javadoc rethinking? Steven Simpson <ss@domain.invalid> - 2013-01-16 18:49 +0000
Re: Javadoc rethinking? "John B. Matthews" <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2013-01-17 00:35 -0500
Re: Javadoc rethinking? Jukka Lahtinen <jtfjdehf@hotmail.com.invalid> - 2013-01-16 21:18 +0200
Re: Javadoc rethinking? Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2013-01-16 23:33 -0800
csiph-web