Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #19547
| From | Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Private Tomcat/JVM |
| Date | 2012-10-28 15:11 +0100 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <k6jef1$22l$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <c5f45b78-a2f1-4310-8322-75a3616b2fe9@googlegroups.com> |
On 28/10/2012 03:37, sb5309 allegedly wrote: > I am looking for a java web host so that I can write java programs that listens to a certain port. > > I discover 2 types of hosts: private java (JVM) host and private Tomcat host (more expensive). > > I am not too sure what is the difference. Can someone explain a little ? Firstly, mind that the word "private" makes no sense in this combination, and that Tomcat sits atop a JVM. In a nutshell, Tomcat is a /Servlet Engine/, providing you with a framework to perform web-related operations. It is but one of a couple similar frameworks, cf. for instance <http://www.servlets.com/engines/>. If you are planning to do web/HTTP related operations, and especially if your server is going to perform more than one very limited function, I would recommend that you use a Servlet Engine, because it's going to make your life much easier (and is valuable knowledge). If you plan just on having a poor socket listening for one low-level network operation -- say, Java RMI --, going with just the JVM /might/ be more economical. -- DF.
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Private Tomcat/JVM sb5309 <sb5309@hotmail.com> - 2012-10-27 19:37 -0700 Re: Private Tomcat/JVM Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2012-10-28 15:11 +0100 Re: Private Tomcat/JVM Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2012-10-28 12:00 -0400
csiph-web