Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #18611

Re: Objects only passed by copy?

From Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid>
Newsgroups comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject Re: Objects only passed by copy?
Date 2012-09-08 21:30 -0400
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <k2grgj$n3$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References <6e06860b-4c72-4f4b-8892-69aa4242a4dc@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw


On 9/8/2012 8:22 PM, Luft wrote:
> I'm learning JAVA and read that EVERYTHING in JAVA is passed by copy and that in the case of objects the internal variables share a reference but that objects are also passed by copy.

     Argument expressions provide values, those values initialize
method or constructor parameters.  In that sense "passed by copy"
is correct ("passed by value" is the more usual phrase): The
parameter gets a copy of the value of the argument expression,
not the expression itself.  That is why you can call a method
like `something(x + 3)' or `otherthing(obj.getAnswer())', even
though you cannot write `x + 3 = 9' or `obj.getAnswer() = "NO"'.

     Some people (and some writers of books) like to say that
primitive values (int, double, and so on) are passed by value,
while objects (String, JButton, et al.) are passed by reference.
I think this is needlessly confusing -- and it still doesn't
explain `otherthing(obj.getAnswer())'.  To my mind, it is more
useful to think of everything being passed by value, where a
"value" may be

     - a primitive value like 5 or 98.6 or 'X' or false, or

     - a reference value that is a "handle" for some object
       instance (or is null).

With this point of view many things that are complicated in the
"pass by value or sometimes by reference" scheme become much
simpler: You *always* pass by value, whether the value is a
primitive or a reference.

     With either viewpoint objects are not "passed by copy," by
which I mean that the object inside the method is not an independent
copy of the object provided by the caller.  There's just one object,
and the method gets a copy of the *reference* to that object -- and
that leads to the example below.

> I'm trying to think of a piece of code that would demonstrate this but can't think of anything off the top of my head.

     Okay.  Let's write a method that appends 'X' to a StringBuilder:

	static void appendX(StringBuilder builder) {
	    builder.append('X');
	}

Simple enough, right?  Fine, now let's call it:

	StringBuilder adage = new StringBuilder(
	    "Better late than never.");
	System.out.println(adage);  // prints the old saying
	appendX(adage);
	System.out.println(adage);  // prints ... what?

Question: After the call, does the StringBuilder instance that
`adage' refers to contain an 'X' or not?

     If the StringBuilder *instance* is copied, appendX() has
its own independent StringBuilder to play with.  It can append
its 'X', or append twenty 'X'es, or insert an 'X' in the middle
of what's already there -- but the StringBuilder in the caller,
the one `adage' refers to, will be unchanged because appendX()
is using a copy, not the original.

     If the StringBuilder *reference* is copied, appendX() has
a reference to the same StringBuilder instance that `adage'
designates.  When appendX() adds its 'X', it changes the content
of that one single StringBuilder instance, and the caller will
now find an 'X' on the end of `adage'.

     Which is it?  Make your prediction before trying the code,
then try the code and check your answer.

-- 
Eric Sosman
esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid
"The speed at which the system fails is usually not important."

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Objects only passed by copy? Luft <edamron@spamcop.net> - 2012-09-08 17:22 -0700
  Re: Objects only passed by copy? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-09-08 20:59 -0400
    Re: Objects only passed by copy? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-09-08 21:02 -0400
  Re: Objects only passed by copy? Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2012-09-08 21:30 -0400
    Re: Objects only passed by copy? Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-09-30 17:23 -0700
  Re: Objects only passed by copy? Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-09-08 19:57 -0700
    Re: Objects only passed by copy? Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-09-30 13:50 -0700

csiph-web