Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #17023

Re: Type of a generic class?

Path	csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From	markspace <-@.>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject	Re: Type of a generic class?
Date	Thu, 02 Aug 2012 20:08:29 -0700
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Lines	51
Message-ID	<jvffbg$mvl$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	<qivqe9-k9.ln1@whirlwind.fredriksson.dy.fi> <jveq7j$2mo$1@dont-email.me> <j0fre9-61u.ln1@whirlwind.fredriksson.dy.fi>
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
Injection-Date	Fri, 3 Aug 2012 03:08:32 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info	mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="61282af8d6595e8d991edb5ac03d6e00"; logging-data="23541"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/zF03FYdF6rgZhrx5jfgLOHlXKNvVGfZM="
User-Agent	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0
In-Reply-To	<j0fre9-61u.ln1@whirlwind.fredriksson.dy.fi>
Cancel-Lock	sha1:VEm/z/XyCu7Hq/DtVG9vKBaRYMw=
Xref	csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:17023

Show key headers only | View raw

On 8/2/2012 4:27 PM, Donkey Hottie wrote:

> It is indeed kind of spooky and strange idea, after all what is so wrong
> about simple
>
>      String value = SystemProperties.getString("ParamName") ;
>
> It is OK, but I'm kind of toying with idea of strong typing of System
> Parameters: A Date can not be stored as Long or Double etc..

To do something like this, I'd arrange some implementation for the 
parameter:

class Parameter {
   public void processParam( String param ) {
      double d = Double.parse( param ); // or whatever...
      ...
   }
}

And then use a Map as Lew suggests or some other method of binding the 
Parameter class to the string "ParamName".

(You could, for example use Class.forName():
   Parameter proc = Class.forName( 
"my.project.parameter."+"ParamName").newInstance();

or you could use annotations:

@Parameter("ParamName")
class Parameter {...

or any other crazy thing you like.  It would probably be better than 
what you have now.)

> The back end of the system parameters is simply
>
> CREATE TABLE SystemParameters
> (
>      name varchar(64) not null primary_key,
>      value varchar(512)
> ) ;

I've written this table definition.  In fact it was 23 odd years ago, as 
in intern while still in college.  I don't know if it's good or bad 
practice, but it seems a common idea.

Thread

Type of a generic class? Donkey Hottie <donkey@fredriksson.dy.fi> - 2012-08-02 22:04 +0300
  Re: Type of a generic class? Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-08-02 14:01 -0700
  Re: Type of a generic class? markspace <-@.> - 2012-08-02 14:08 -0700
    Re: Type of a generic class? Donkey Hottie <donkey@fredriksson.dy.fi> - 2012-08-03 02:27 +0300
      Re: Type of a generic class? Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-08-02 16:51 -0700
      Re: Type of a generic class? markspace <-@.> - 2012-08-02 20:08 -0700
        Re: Type of a generic class? Donkey Hottie <donkey@fredriksson.dy.fi> - 2012-08-03 17:25 +0300
  Re: Type of a generic class? Donkey Hottie <donkey@fredriksson.dy.fi> - 2012-08-04 13:46 +0300

csiph-web