Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #15445

Re: ImageIO/BufferedImage behaving inconsistently from one day to the next.

Path	csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From	Fred Greer <fggreer@nospam.invalid>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject	Re: ImageIO/BufferedImage behaving inconsistently from one day to the next.
Date	Wed, 20 Jun 2012 04:08:03 +0000 (UTC)
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Lines	19
Message-ID	<jrrib2$fvt$3@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	<jrrcl4$f5v$3@dont-email.me> <r_GdnQzIUPcg2HzSnZ2dnUVZ_uadnZ2d@earthlink.com>
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding	8bit
Injection-Date	Wed, 20 Jun 2012 04:08:03 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info	mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="VCVQ51H5cIpUVjyIeCvePw"; logging-data="16381"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19ib71PMCKJlLJ4KyQQryfPqYuuEqU5uxo="
X-Mailer	MicroPlanet-Gravity/3.0.4
Cancel-Lock	sha1:dpPmFzPM4RNiIzt0/VMQLshdbfo=
Xref	csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:15445

Show key headers only | View raw

On Tue, 19 Jun 2012 20:38:40 -0700, Patricia Shanahan wrote:

> On 6/19/2012 7:31 PM, Fred Greer wrote: ...
>> Neither of these makes much sense, because standard library code is not
>> supposed to magically change its behavior like that, and it's certainly
>> not supposed to make something that used to work no longer work by
>> magically changing its behavior overnight.
> 
> Is your code multi-threaded?
> 
> I'm asking because things that transition "magically" between working
> and not working are often timing dependent, and transition because of a
> change that affects relative speeds, such as file placement and cache
> history.
> 
> Patricia

It's single-threaded.

Thread

ImageIO/BufferedImage behaving inconsistently from one day to the next. Fred Greer <fggreer@nospam.invalid> - 2012-06-20 02:31 +0000
  Re: ImageIO/BufferedImage behaving inconsistently from one day to the next. markspace <-@.> - 2012-06-19 19:38 -0700
    Re: ImageIO/BufferedImage behaving inconsistently from one day to the next. Fred Greer <fggreer@nospam.invalid> - 2012-06-20 03:07 +0000
  Re: ImageIO/BufferedImage behaving inconsistently from one day to the next. markspace <-@.> - 2012-06-19 20:22 -0700
    Re: ImageIO/BufferedImage behaving inconsistently from one day to the next. "John B. Matthews" <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2012-06-20 14:26 -0400
  Re: ImageIO/BufferedImage behaving inconsistently from one day to the next. Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2012-06-19 20:38 -0700
    Re: ImageIO/BufferedImage behaving inconsistently from one day to the next. Fred Greer <fggreer@nospam.invalid> - 2012-06-20 04:08 +0000
  Re: ImageIO/BufferedImage behaving inconsistently from one day to the next. Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-06-20 01:16 -0700
    Re: ImageIO/BufferedImage behaving inconsistently from one day to the next. Joerg Meier <joergmmeier@arcor.de> - 2012-06-20 11:44 +0200
    Re: ImageIO/BufferedImage behaving inconsistently from one day to the next. Fred Greer <fggreer@nospam.invalid> - 2012-06-21 00:22 +0000
  Re: ImageIO/BufferedImage behaving inconsistently from one day to the next. Knute Johnson <nospam@knutejohnson.com> - 2012-06-20 08:39 -0700
    Re: ImageIO/BufferedImage behaving inconsistently from one day to the next. Fred Greer <fggreer@nospam.invalid> - 2012-06-21 00:23 +0000
      Re: ImageIO/BufferedImage behaving inconsistently from one day to the next. Knute Johnson <nospam@knutejohnson.com> - 2012-06-20 21:23 -0700
        Re: ImageIO/BufferedImage behaving inconsistently from one day to the next. Fred Greer <fggreer@nospam.invalid> - 2012-06-21 04:58 +0000
          Re: ImageIO/BufferedImage behaving inconsistently from one day to the next. Knute Johnson <nospam@knutejohnson.com> - 2012-06-21 05:58 -0700

csiph-web