Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #14227

Re: JDBC transaction isolation

Path csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From "Richard Maher" <maher_rj@hotspamnotmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject Re: JDBC transaction isolation
Date Fri, 4 May 2012 06:23:53 +0800
Organization HTTP *is* The Box - Let's think outside
Lines 27
Message-ID <jnv0i7$mta$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink)
References <jnu4pj$ncr$1@dont-email.me> <4fa2aa0c$0$294$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <jnujl6$os4$1@dont-email.me> <4fa2d5c7$0$288$14726298@news.sunsite.dk>
NNTP-Posting-Host jOhPn0KFjrxwuMc9OPMmCw.user.speranza.aioe.org
X-Complaints-To abuse@aioe.org
X-MimeOLE Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157
X-RFC2646 Format=Flowed; Response
X-Notice Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
X-Newsreader Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
X-Priority 3
X-MSMail-Priority Normal
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:14227

Show key headers only | View raw


"Arne Vajhøj" <arne@vajhoej.dk> wrote in message 
news:4fa2d5c7$0$288$14726298@news.sunsite.dk...
>
> Almost all database have it at the SQL level:
>
> http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.5/en/set-transaction.html
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/static/sql-set-transaction.html and 
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/static/transaction-iso.html
> http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms173763.aspx
> http://docs.oracle.com/cd/B10500_01/server.920/a96524/c21cnsis.htm
>

Is anyone else of the opinion that Oracle really does not support the 
serializable isolation level? (At least not in the way that SQL Server, Rdb, 
and I'm sure others do) That is, it doesn't prevent inserts to the other 
txn's result-set,touched-rows by locking but rather fudges some sort of 
snapshot/consistent-view of old data. (And even then with restrictions) 
Eg: - select count(*) from employees where dept_code=1;

>
> Arne
>

Cheers Richard Maher 

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

JDBC transaction isolation markspace <-@.> - 2012-05-03 07:30 -0700
  Re: JDBC transaction isolation Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-05-03 11:53 -0400
    Re: JDBC transaction isolation markspace <-@.> - 2012-05-03 11:43 -0700
      Re: JDBC transaction isolation Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-05-03 15:00 -0400
        Re: JDBC transaction isolation Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-05-03 14:00 -0700
          Re: JDBC transaction isolation Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-05-03 17:13 -0400
        Re: JDBC transaction isolation "Richard Maher" <maher_rj@hotspamnotmail.com> - 2012-05-04 06:23 +0800
          Re: JDBC transaction isolation Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-05-03 19:57 -0400
            Re: JDBC transaction isolation Richard Maher <maherrj@googlemail.com> - 2012-05-03 19:08 -0700
              Re: JDBC transaction isolation Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-05-03 22:34 -0400
                Re: JDBC transaction isolation Richard Maher <maherrj@googlemail.com> - 2012-05-03 20:11 -0700
                Re: JDBC transaction isolation Richard Maher <maherrj@googlemail.com> - 2012-05-03 22:33 -0700
                Re: JDBC transaction isolation Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-05-04 08:27 -0400
                Re: JDBC transaction isolation Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-05-04 06:58 -0700
          Re: JDBC transaction isolation Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-05-03 17:15 -0700
            Re: JDBC transaction isolation Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-05-03 21:22 -0400
              Re: JDBC transaction isolation Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-05-03 18:32 -0700

csiph-web