Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #11392
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.albasani.net!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: cloning |
| Date | Mon, 16 Jan 2012 14:03:33 -0800 |
| Organization | albasani.net |
| Lines | 54 |
| Message-ID | <jf26rl$20s$1@news.albasani.net> (permalink) |
| References | <36a0318f-278e-4f92-8a50-b804b3d7c8f7@k28g2000yqn.googlegroups.com> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| X-Trace | news.albasani.net lXIvemUfrN5c9ryxmoKX5qK7/eRWD5FpKWlqSI8joM3FYWHHwh5eWp3G4WcsjGDSjEytuEs1FHxIoZeaNbabgMwl1pHJP+UugYglOB/4nrps3r4GzPRPpOCmGO/Wwmm0 |
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Mon, 16 Jan 2012 22:03:34 +0000 (UTC) |
| Injection-Info | news.albasani.net; logging-data="BeDDiPZOvsQwdu9GJnFq9hQgqWWoIZ+xE+nicMfKrM2mCNZcNx+u3cskcx7daW5Ww34rmCodde2phWDjT6OOg6wPRQnXsQGwqGTm8GYPJT/ltGV3vLaTFrVEVjagcO/P"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@albasani.net" |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.24) Gecko/20111109 Thunderbird/3.1.16 |
| In-Reply-To | <36a0318f-278e-4f92-8a50-b804b3d7c8f7@k28g2000yqn.googlegroups.com> |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:93Rzt1n5xp5kDqC0vMxHRNO/FVQ= |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:11392 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 01/16/2012 10:27 AM, albert kao wrote:
> I want to clone the following class so is the following code ok?
> public class TestImpl implements Serializable {
'private static final long serialVersionUID'?
Have you studied up on 'Serializable'? It's a dangerous tool in the hands of
the sorcerer's apprentice.
<http://java.sun.com/docs/books/effective/>
Chapter 11, "Serialization"
Yes, he gives it an entire chapter.
> private int id = 0;
You don't need to initialize 'id' to zero twice.
What's that? Well, zero is already the default value. Then you assign zero
to the variable in a second, explicit initialization. That's twice.
Having said that, there are sometimes reasons for an explicit initialization
of a default value, and it's required for 'final' variables.
> private java.sql.Timestamp createDateTime;
import directives, anyone?
> private java.sql.Date expiryDate;
I agree that you don't want an import for 'java.sql.Date'.
> private java.math.BigDecimal amount;
Good choice of type.
> private java.sql.Timestamp deleteTimestamp;
>
> // other methods
> // ...
Really good variable names, by the way.
> @Override
> public Object clone() throws CloneNotSupportedException {
> return (TestImpl)super.clone();
> }
> }
I suggest that either you eliminate the cast or have a covariant return type.
--
Lew
Honi soit qui mal y pense.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/cf/Friz.jpg
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
cloning albert kao <albertkao3@gmail.com> - 2012-01-16 10:27 -0800
Re: cloning Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-01-16 15:29 -0500
Re: cloning Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2012-01-16 13:47 -0800
Re: cloning Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-01-16 16:52 -0500
Re: cloning Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2012-01-16 14:04 -0800
Re: cloning Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-01-16 17:14 -0500
Re: cloning Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2012-01-16 14:03 -0800
Re: cloning Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-01-17 09:55 -0800
Re: cloning Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-01-17 17:37 -0500
csiph-web