Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #11279
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: FindBugs complaining about non-serializable field although everything looks Serializable |
| Date | Thu, 12 Jan 2012 12:04:52 -0500 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Lines | 85 |
| Message-ID | <jen3e5$vms$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <a3ed0747-5eb5-4da1-9f7f-c6ebdc8cbafd@v13g2000yqc.googlegroups.com> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| Injection-Date | Thu, 12 Jan 2012 16:57:42 +0000 (UTC) |
| Injection-Info | mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="qwFw1g9RsQ6TkML5yezG9A"; logging-data="32476"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/EakpGqvKVQpqrB7JU2Kv7Z9Xp0f9nfXc=" |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20111110 Icedove/3.0.11 |
| In-Reply-To | <a3ed0747-5eb5-4da1-9f7f-c6ebdc8cbafd@v13g2000yqc.googlegroups.com> |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:WjAFuWKALx987b7iSlwQRjquQI0= |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:11279 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 01/12/2012 11:40 AM, laredotornado@zipmail.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using Java 1.6. My FindBugs tool is giving me this error ...
>
>
> Non-transient non-serializable instance field in serializable
?<http://findbugs.sourceforge.net/bugDescriptions.html#SE_BAD_FIELD>
> class
> Class com.myco.clearing.common.xml.Node defines non-transient non-
> serializable instance field children
>
>
> The class and its private fields that Findbugs is complaining about
> are below ...
>
>
> public class Node implements Serializable, Comparable<Node>,
> Cloneable {
> /**
> * For serializable classes.
> */
> private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
>
> /**
> * Unique id
> */
> private long id;
> /**
> * Node Name
> */
> private String name;
> /**
> * Node value
> */
> private String value = "";
> /**
> * Child nodes
> */
> private List<Node> children;
> /**
> * Parent node
> */
> private Node parent;
> /**
> * Node attributes
> */
> private List<Attribute> attributes;
>
>
> I have a public, no-argument constructor and getter/setter methods for
> all the fields you see (except serialVersionUID). Any ideas why
> FindBugs is complaining about the field "children" or how I can
> troubleshoot this further?
>
> The above references a class, "Attribute". The relevant parts are
> below. Same thing -- a public, no-argument constructor and getter/
> setter methods present.
>
>
> public class Attribute implements Serializable, Cloneable {
>
> /**
> * For serializable classes.
> */
> private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
>
> /**
> * Attribute Name
> */
> private String name;
> /**
> * Attribute value, can be local or inherited
> */
> private String value;
> /**
> * Node having this attribute
> */
> private Node node;
>
>
> Thanks, - Dave
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
FindBugs complaining about non-serializable field although everything looks Serializable "laredotornado@zipmail.com" <laredotornado@gmail.com> - 2012-01-12 08:40 -0800
Re: FindBugs complaining about non-serializable field although everything looks Serializable Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2012-01-12 12:04 -0500
Re: FindBugs complaining about non-serializable field although everything looks Serializable "laredotornado@zipmail.com" <laredotornado@gmail.com> - 2012-01-12 09:48 -0800
Re: FindBugs complaining about non-serializable field although everything looks Serializable Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-01-12 09:52 -0800
Re: FindBugs complaining about non-serializable field although everything looks Serializable Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-01-12 09:52 -0800
Re: FindBugs complaining about non-serializable field although everything looks Serializable Ian Shef <invalid@avoiding.spam> - 2012-01-12 19:29 +0000
Re: FindBugs complaining about non-serializable field although everything looks Serializable Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2012-01-12 21:10 -0800
Re: FindBugs complaining about non-serializable field although everything looks Serializable Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2012-01-12 21:11 -0800
Re: FindBugs complaining about non-serializable field although everything looks Serializable Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-01-14 23:23 -0500
Re: FindBugs complaining about non-serializable field although everything looks Serializable Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2012-01-15 10:18 -0800
csiph-web