Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #9773

Re: unicode

From markspace <-@.>
Newsgroups comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject Re: unicode
Date 2011-11-07 21:12 -0800
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <j9adna$9pk$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References (6 earlier) <4e6ff2a9$0$313$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <j4p3oh$pa2$1@dont-email.me> <4eb89437$0$286$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <j9a71d$a3k$1@dont-email.me> <4eb8a64f$0$286$14726298@news.sunsite.dk>

Show all headers | View raw


On 11/7/2011 7:47 PM, Arne Vajhøj wrote:
> If you search the Java bug database then you will see that
> SUN got lots of bug reports including some that were compiler
> bugs about this feature.
>
> Somebody did use the feature.


I'll take a look.


> I find it very difficult to see why people (and their employers) that
> have coded according to spec should suffer to help people that have
> not studied the spec.


It's still a $ and cents equation in my mind.  "Suffering" doesn't enter 
the equation.  No matter what the feature, there's got to be a point 
where it's rational to drop support for it.  Happens all the time.

You may disagree with that in regards to this particular issue, but I'm 
having a somewhat hard time seeing why it isn't obvious in the general 
case: sometimes features must be dropped.

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar


Thread

Re: unicode Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-11-07 21:30 -0500
  Re: unicode markspace <-@.> - 2011-11-07 19:18 -0800
    Re: unicode Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-11-07 22:47 -0500
      Re: unicode markspace <-@.> - 2011-11-07 21:12 -0800

csiph-web