Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #8529
| From | Philipp Kraus <philipp.kraus@flashpixx.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: JNI generic type of jobject |
| Date | 2011-10-04 18:01 +0200 |
| Organization | 1&1 Internet AG |
| Message-ID | <j6fakj$v5v$1@online.de> (permalink) |
| References | <j6etsu$lkf$1@online.de> <4e8afbde$0$2529$e4fe514c@news2.news.xs4all.nl> <C5Fiq.2704$x14.849@newsfe22.iad> |
On 2011-10-04 16:53:22 +0200, Daniel Pitts said:
> On 10/4/11 5:28 AM, Silvio wrote:
>> On 10/04/2011 02:23 PM, Philipp Kraus wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I use JNI calls for some Java classes. Some Java classes are generic
>>> classes like:
>>>
>>> class mytestclass<T> {
>>>
>>> public native void mymethod();
>>>
>>> }
>>>
>>> The stub shows:
>>>
>>> JNIEXPORT void JNICALL Java_mytestclass_mymethod(JNIEnv* p_env, jobject
>>> p_object)
>>>
>>> How can I get from the jobject which object type is the generic
>>> parameter T? Because I would
>>> like to create different codes if I do something like:
>>>
>>> mytestclass<int> x = new mytestclass<int>();
>>> x.mymethod();
>>>
>>> mytestclass<String> x = new mytestclass<String>();
>>> x.mymethod();
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> Phil
>>>
>>>
>>
>> No such thing is possible. Generics are a compile time thing. At runtime
>> only the raw types are available.
>>
>> Silvio
>
> int is not a valid generic type parameter, as int is a primitive and
> generic types must by Object types.
>
> Also, generics are not the same as C++ templates. There isn't
> different code created for each concrete usage. Its all exactly the
> same code.
>
> If you are doing different behavior based on the compile time type,
> then you need to do a little bit more work to implement the strategy
> pattern.
>
> class MyTestClass<T> {
> private MyMethodStrategy<T> strategy;
>
> public mymethod() {
> strategy.mymethod(this);
> }
> }
>
> interface MyMethodStrategy<T> {
> void mymethod(MyTestClass<T> testClass);
> }
>
>
> class MyStringMethodStrategy implement MyMethodStrategy<String> {
> public native void mymethod(MyTestClass<String> testClass);
> }
>
>
> class MyIntegerMethodStrategy implement MyMethodStrategy<Integer> {
> public native void mymethod(MyTestClass<Integer> testClass);
> }
>
>
> Then you will have two different native methods to implement each strategy.
This a very good solution, I implement my own pattern
Thanks
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
JNI generic type of jobject Philipp Kraus <philipp.kraus@flashpixx.de> - 2011-10-04 14:23 +0200
Re: JNI generic type of jobject Silvio <silvio@moc.com> - 2011-10-04 14:28 +0200
Re: JNI generic type of jobject Philipp Kraus <philipp.kraus@flashpixx.de> - 2011-10-04 14:49 +0200
Re: JNI generic type of jobject Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2011-10-04 07:53 -0700
Re: JNI generic type of jobject Philipp Kraus <philipp.kraus@flashpixx.de> - 2011-10-04 18:01 +0200
Re: JNI generic type of jobject Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-10-04 12:01 -0700
Re: JNI generic type of jobject Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2011-10-04 12:15 -0700
csiph-web