Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #7219
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.albasani.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Joshua Cranmer <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: enhance an array's static type by a lower length-bound. |
| Date | Thu, 18 Aug 2011 10:30:04 -0500 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Lines | 21 |
| Message-ID | <j2jb67$492$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <slrnj4nm33.6gl.avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> <j2gu2q$2tm$1@dont-email.me> <slrnj4q40p.6gl.avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| Injection-Date | Thu, 18 Aug 2011 15:30:15 +0000 (UTC) |
| Injection-Info | mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="WpcHJSul77m+zlbR9GVqkA"; logging-data="4386"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19RuQdGBe7Y9mxlIWmw/C4gnbvjrKREt3Y=" |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110812 Thunderbird/6.0 |
| In-Reply-To | <slrnj4q40p.6gl.avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:/zCqd1ZpOZTARf+tEqq8iCqtRCI= |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:7219 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 8/18/2011 8:14 AM, Andreas Leitgeb wrote: > Joshua Cranmer<Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> wrote: >> On 8/17/2011 10:04 AM, Andreas Leitgeb wrote: >>> I believe such a change would be source-compatible, but might require >>> some severe changes at the bytecode/class-file-format level, to allow >>> to specify such a lower bound in a type signature. Such a change should >>> be possible in a way, that old class-files can still be used. e.g.: >>> get9th:(]10I)I (currently without bounds: get9th:([I)I ) >> You could do it by adding a few new annotations, > > I must admit, that I've so far mostly ignored Annotations for my > tasks. When you write "adding a few annotations", do you just mean > adding certain standard annotations to the respective places, or did > you mean defining a custom Annotation and write some code for a > compiler-plugin that would then deal with one's new Annotations? I was actually referring to class file annotations, not Java annotations. -- Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not tried it. -- Donald E. Knuth
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
enhance an array's static type by a lower length-bound. Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-08-17 15:04 +0000
Re: enhance an array's static type by a lower length-bound. Joshua Cranmer <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> - 2011-08-17 12:34 -0500
Re: enhance an array's static type by a lower length-bound. Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-08-18 13:14 +0000
Re: enhance an array's static type by a lower length-bound. Joshua Cranmer <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> - 2011-08-18 10:30 -0500
Re: enhance an array's static type by a lower length-bound. Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-08-18 18:12 +0000
Re: enhance an array's static type by a lower length-bound. Joshua Cranmer <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> - 2011-08-18 20:59 -0500
Re: enhance an array's static type by a lower length-bound. Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-08-17 20:42 +0200
Re: enhance an array's static type by a lower length-bound. Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-08-18 21:44 +0000
Re: enhance an array's static type by a lower length-bound. Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-08-19 13:24 +0200
Re: enhance an array's static type by a lower length-bound. Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-08-20 17:20 +0000
Re: enhance an array's static type by a lower length-bound. Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-08-17 22:11 -0700
Re: enhance an array's static type by a lower length-bound. Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-08-17 23:17 -0700
Re: enhance an array's static type by a lower length-bound. Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-08-18 10:41 +0000
Re: enhance an array's static type by a lower length-bound. Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-08-18 06:34 -0700
Re: enhance an array's static type by a lower length-bound. Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-08-18 18:08 +0000
Re: enhance an array's static type by a lower length-bound. Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-08-18 17:53 -0700
Re: enhance an array's static type by a lower length-bound. Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-08-20 17:31 +0000
Re: enhance an array's static type by a lower length-bound. Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-08-20 10:50 -0700
Re: enhance an array's static type by a lower length-bound. Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-08-21 10:47 +0200
Re: enhance an array's static type by a lower length-bound. Michal Kleczek <kleku@poczta.onet.pl> - 2011-08-21 20:27 +0200
csiph-web