Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #6931

Re: JavaMail bug?

Path csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder2.enfer-du-nord.net!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!usenet.ukfsn.org!not-for-mail
From Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid>
Newsgroups comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject Re: JavaMail bug?
Date Tue, 9 Aug 2011 22:47:03 +0000 (UTC)
Organization UK Free Software Network
Lines 31
Message-ID <j1sdd6$kkc$1@localhost.localdomain> (permalink)
References <j0fb5e$sat$1@localhost.localdomain> <995djcFq0nU1@mid.individual.net> <j0khlj$8bg$3@localhost.localdomain> <j0kilj$8bg$4@localhost.localdomain> <j0v8t7$os9$1@localhost.localdomain> <99njvpFv11U1@mid.individual.net> <j1771e$smf$1@localhost.localdomain> <99qjntFk6uU1@mid.individual.net> <j19l2v$h45$1@localhost.localdomain> <99sf3vFncoU1@mid.individual.net> <j1pp73$tje$1@localhost.localdomain> <9acnlmF447U1@mid.individual.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host 84.45.235.129
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding 8bit
X-Trace localhost.localdomain 1312930023 21132 84.45.235.129 (9 Aug 2011 22:47:03 GMT)
X-Complaints-To usenet@localhost.localdomain
NNTP-Posting-Date Tue, 9 Aug 2011 22:47:03 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent Pan/0.133 (House of Butterflies)
Xref x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:6931

Show key headers only | View raw


On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 13:31:49 +0100, Nigel Wade wrote:

> Personally I'd still get rid of it unless you are actively using it.
> It's somewhat in the realm of "security by obscurity". There's a
> potential for the vulnerability to be exposed, or for the configuration
> to migrate somewhere where it is exposed.
>
Its unlikely that anything like that would happen. This is my house 
server that I'm describing. The config is whatever I set it to and nobody 
else is ever likely to touch it.

> Imagine your firewall goes
> down, the mail server stops working
>
Indeed. If the firewall breaks, nothing will work until it gets replaced.

> I see the documentation showing use of Transport.sendMessage() (an
> abstract instance method) following a Session.getTransport().
>
Sure, but they are all static apart from sendMessage, which is abstract.
 
> I don't see use of Transport.send().
>
True enough.



-- 
martin@   | Martin Gregorie
gregorie. | Essex, UK
org       |

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

JavaMail bug? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-07-23 20:32 +0000
  Re: JavaMail bug? Knute Johnson <september@knutejohnson.com> - 2011-07-23 20:54 -0700
    Re: JavaMail bug? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-07-24 09:50 +0000
      Re: JavaMail bug? Knute Johnson <september@knutejohnson.com> - 2011-07-24 09:27 -0700
        Re: JavaMail bug? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-07-25 19:36 +0000
          Re: JavaMail bug? Knute Johnson <nospam@rabbitbrush.frazmtn.com> - 2011-07-25 23:00 -0700
            Re: JavaMail bug? Steve Sobol <sjsobol@JustThe.net> - 2011-07-25 23:18 -0700
              Re: JavaMail bug? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-07-26 17:49 +0000
            Re: JavaMail bug? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-07-26 17:42 +0000
  Re: JavaMail bug? Nigel Wade <nmw-news@ion.le.ac.uk> - 2011-07-25 15:40 +0100
    Re: JavaMail bug? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-07-25 19:54 +0000
      Re: JavaMail bug? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-07-25 20:11 +0000
        Re: JavaMail bug? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-07-29 21:32 +0000
          Re: JavaMail bug? Knute Johnson <september@knutejohnson.com> - 2011-07-29 16:26 -0700
          Re: JavaMail bug? Nigel Wade <nmw-news@ion.le.ac.uk> - 2011-08-01 13:20 +0100
            Re: JavaMail bug? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-08-01 21:49 +0000
              Re: JavaMail bug? Nigel Wade <nmw-news@ion.le.ac.uk> - 2011-08-02 16:34 +0100
                Re: JavaMail bug? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-08-02 20:01 +0000
                Re: JavaMail bug? Nigel Wade <nmw-news@ion.le.ac.uk> - 2011-08-03 09:27 +0100
                Re: JavaMail bug? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-08-08 22:50 +0000
                Re: JavaMail bug? Nigel Wade <nmw-news@ion.le.ac.uk> - 2011-08-09 13:31 +0100
                Re: JavaMail bug? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-08-09 22:47 +0000
                Re: JavaMail bug? Nigel Wade <nmw-news@ion.le.ac.uk> - 2011-08-10 09:34 +0100
                Re: JavaMail bug? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-08-10 19:37 +0000
                Re: JavaMail bug? Nigel Wade <nmw-news@ion.le.ac.uk> - 2011-08-03 09:38 +0100
                Re: JavaMail bug? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-08-16 21:06 +0000
                Re: JavaMail bug? Nigel Wade <nmw-news@ion.le.ac.uk> - 2011-08-17 10:29 +0100
                Re: JavaMail bug? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-08-17 19:54 +0000
                Re: JavaMail bug? Nigel Wade <nmw-news@ion.le.ac.uk> - 2011-08-18 09:34 +0100
                Re: JavaMail bug? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-08-18 19:50 +0000
          Re: JavaMail bug? Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-08-01 12:54 +0000

csiph-web