Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #6931
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder2.enfer-du-nord.net!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!usenet.ukfsn.org!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: JavaMail bug? |
| Date | Tue, 9 Aug 2011 22:47:03 +0000 (UTC) |
| Organization | UK Free Software Network |
| Lines | 31 |
| Message-ID | <j1sdd6$kkc$1@localhost.localdomain> (permalink) |
| References | <j0fb5e$sat$1@localhost.localdomain> <995djcFq0nU1@mid.individual.net> <j0khlj$8bg$3@localhost.localdomain> <j0kilj$8bg$4@localhost.localdomain> <j0v8t7$os9$1@localhost.localdomain> <99njvpFv11U1@mid.individual.net> <j1771e$smf$1@localhost.localdomain> <99qjntFk6uU1@mid.individual.net> <j19l2v$h45$1@localhost.localdomain> <99sf3vFncoU1@mid.individual.net> <j1pp73$tje$1@localhost.localdomain> <9acnlmF447U1@mid.individual.net> |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 84.45.235.129 |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=UTF-8 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 8bit |
| X-Trace | localhost.localdomain 1312930023 21132 84.45.235.129 (9 Aug 2011 22:47:03 GMT) |
| X-Complaints-To | usenet@localhost.localdomain |
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Tue, 9 Aug 2011 22:47:03 +0000 (UTC) |
| User-Agent | Pan/0.133 (House of Butterflies) |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:6931 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 13:31:49 +0100, Nigel Wade wrote: > Personally I'd still get rid of it unless you are actively using it. > It's somewhat in the realm of "security by obscurity". There's a > potential for the vulnerability to be exposed, or for the configuration > to migrate somewhere where it is exposed. > Its unlikely that anything like that would happen. This is my house server that I'm describing. The config is whatever I set it to and nobody else is ever likely to touch it. > Imagine your firewall goes > down, the mail server stops working > Indeed. If the firewall breaks, nothing will work until it gets replaced. > I see the documentation showing use of Transport.sendMessage() (an > abstract instance method) following a Session.getTransport(). > Sure, but they are all static apart from sendMessage, which is abstract. > I don't see use of Transport.send(). > True enough. -- martin@ | Martin Gregorie gregorie. | Essex, UK org |
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
JavaMail bug? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-07-23 20:32 +0000
Re: JavaMail bug? Knute Johnson <september@knutejohnson.com> - 2011-07-23 20:54 -0700
Re: JavaMail bug? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-07-24 09:50 +0000
Re: JavaMail bug? Knute Johnson <september@knutejohnson.com> - 2011-07-24 09:27 -0700
Re: JavaMail bug? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-07-25 19:36 +0000
Re: JavaMail bug? Knute Johnson <nospam@rabbitbrush.frazmtn.com> - 2011-07-25 23:00 -0700
Re: JavaMail bug? Steve Sobol <sjsobol@JustThe.net> - 2011-07-25 23:18 -0700
Re: JavaMail bug? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-07-26 17:49 +0000
Re: JavaMail bug? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-07-26 17:42 +0000
Re: JavaMail bug? Nigel Wade <nmw-news@ion.le.ac.uk> - 2011-07-25 15:40 +0100
Re: JavaMail bug? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-07-25 19:54 +0000
Re: JavaMail bug? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-07-25 20:11 +0000
Re: JavaMail bug? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-07-29 21:32 +0000
Re: JavaMail bug? Knute Johnson <september@knutejohnson.com> - 2011-07-29 16:26 -0700
Re: JavaMail bug? Nigel Wade <nmw-news@ion.le.ac.uk> - 2011-08-01 13:20 +0100
Re: JavaMail bug? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-08-01 21:49 +0000
Re: JavaMail bug? Nigel Wade <nmw-news@ion.le.ac.uk> - 2011-08-02 16:34 +0100
Re: JavaMail bug? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-08-02 20:01 +0000
Re: JavaMail bug? Nigel Wade <nmw-news@ion.le.ac.uk> - 2011-08-03 09:27 +0100
Re: JavaMail bug? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-08-08 22:50 +0000
Re: JavaMail bug? Nigel Wade <nmw-news@ion.le.ac.uk> - 2011-08-09 13:31 +0100
Re: JavaMail bug? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-08-09 22:47 +0000
Re: JavaMail bug? Nigel Wade <nmw-news@ion.le.ac.uk> - 2011-08-10 09:34 +0100
Re: JavaMail bug? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-08-10 19:37 +0000
Re: JavaMail bug? Nigel Wade <nmw-news@ion.le.ac.uk> - 2011-08-03 09:38 +0100
Re: JavaMail bug? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-08-16 21:06 +0000
Re: JavaMail bug? Nigel Wade <nmw-news@ion.le.ac.uk> - 2011-08-17 10:29 +0100
Re: JavaMail bug? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-08-17 19:54 +0000
Re: JavaMail bug? Nigel Wade <nmw-news@ion.le.ac.uk> - 2011-08-18 09:34 +0100
Re: JavaMail bug? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-08-18 19:50 +0000
Re: JavaMail bug? Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-08-01 12:54 +0000
csiph-web