Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #5838
| From | Abu Yahya <abu_yahya@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: baseline performance test using java ... |
| Date | 2011-07-04 06:52 +0530 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <iur4jt$mbn$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <1309715588.716395@nntp.aceinnovative.com> <iuqcm0$tmh$2@speranza.aioe.org> <vt2dnfwXi-FFJY3TnZ2dnUVZ_tqdnZ2d@earthlink.com> |
On 7/4/2011 12:15 AM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: > On 7/3/2011 11:33 AM, Abu Yahya wrote: >> On 7/3/2011 11:23 PM, lbrt chx _ gemale kom wrote: >> >>>>> ~ We have all learned we should avoid String(s) and use >>>>> StringBuffer(s) or better yet StringBuilder(s) but there is >>> ~ >>>> Er, no. Strings are great ... >>> ~ >>> I (obviously) meant to say String(s) if you need to build them >>> andStringBuilder(s) >> > if you are working (most of us by now) on some multiprocessing core >>> ~ >> >> If you need to build them, you'd need a StringBuilder. And if you need >> support for multiple threads AND need to modify them, you'd need a >> StringBuffer. > > Often, the StringBuffer locking is not strong enough to be really > useful. If, for example, a thread needs to append two strings to the > buffer and have them appear consecutively in the resulting string, it > needs synchronization at a higher level. True. StringBuffer's locking will only help in guaranteeing an output in which either the first string /or/ the second string is /completely/ appended first. If the order matters, the built-in locking won't help.
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
baseline performance test using java ... lbrt chx _ gemale kom - 2011-07-03 17:53 +0000
Re: baseline performance test using java ... Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2011-07-03 14:08 -0400
Re: baseline performance test using java ... Abu Yahya <abu_yahya@invalid.com> - 2011-07-04 00:03 +0530
Re: baseline performance test using java ... Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-07-03 11:45 -0700
Re: baseline performance test using java ... Abu Yahya <abu_yahya@invalid.com> - 2011-07-04 06:52 +0530
Re: baseline performance test using java ... lewbloch <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-07-04 03:53 -0700
Re: baseline performance test using java ... lewbloch <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-07-04 03:44 -0700
Re: baseline performance test using java ... Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-07-03 12:09 -0700
Re: baseline performance test using java ... Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-07-04 09:54 -0700
csiph-web