Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #5834
| From | Abu Yahya <abu_yahya@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: baseline performance test using java ... |
| Date | 2011-07-04 00:03 +0530 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <iuqcm0$tmh$2@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <1309715588.716395@nntp.aceinnovative.com> |
On 7/3/2011 11:23 PM, lbrt chx _ gemale kom wrote: >>> ~ We have all learned we should avoid String(s) and use >>> StringBuffer(s) or better yet StringBuilder(s) but there is > ~ >> Er, no. Strings are great ... > ~ > I (obviously) meant to say String(s) if you need to build them andStringBuilder(s) > if you are working (most of us by now) on some multiprocessing core > ~ If you need to build them, you'd need a StringBuilder. And if you need support for multiple threads AND need to modify them, you'd need a StringBuffer.
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
baseline performance test using java ... lbrt chx _ gemale kom - 2011-07-03 17:53 +0000
Re: baseline performance test using java ... Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2011-07-03 14:08 -0400
Re: baseline performance test using java ... Abu Yahya <abu_yahya@invalid.com> - 2011-07-04 00:03 +0530
Re: baseline performance test using java ... Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-07-03 11:45 -0700
Re: baseline performance test using java ... Abu Yahya <abu_yahya@invalid.com> - 2011-07-04 06:52 +0530
Re: baseline performance test using java ... lewbloch <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-07-04 03:53 -0700
Re: baseline performance test using java ... lewbloch <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-07-04 03:44 -0700
Re: baseline performance test using java ... Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-07-03 12:09 -0700
Re: baseline performance test using java ... Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-07-04 09:54 -0700
csiph-web