Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register

Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #5077

Re: Managed-Code Bloat

Show all headers | View raw

On 6/7/2011 3:31 AM, Arved Sandstrom wrote:
> On 11-06-06 07:17 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
>> In message<isis49$cpq$1@dont-email.me>, Joshua Cranmer wrote:
>>
>>>    From a programming language design concept, one thing is abundantly
>>> clear: manually-managed memory is a failure.
>>
>> And yet managed code has failed to take off in the mass market. Why is that?
>
> Dude, what do you consider to be managed code? It's not just .NET and
> Java. Fact is, any language system that takes care of some details for
> you that you need to deal with yourself in C or assembly has aspects of
> management. This is a continuous spectrum, not an all or nothing.
>
> As Spolsky puts it, if your language lets you concatenate strings and
> not worry about how it happens, you've got managed code.
>
>>> Most programmers--even the very best--have very little ability to prevent
>>> memory from being leaked. That's why pretty much everyone accuses every
>>> very large application written in native languages as acting like a leaky
>>> bucket: Windows, Firefox, etc.
>>
>> And yet it is the “managed” apps that tend to be the memory hogs.
>
> Really? So C and C++ programs have never been accused of having memory
> management issues. Interesting.
>
> There is actually some truth to your observation however. Again, not for
> the reasons you think. Since when you said "managed" you really meant
> Java and .NET, I'll confine my remarks to those also. Anyway, Java and
> C#, among others, can be abused by incompetent or unschooled or ignorant
> programmers just like any other language can. If a programmer is shabby
> at programming, and more specifically, shabby at OOP, they'll write crap
> in C++ *and* Java *and* C#. With a C++ app it'll probably crash within
> minutes and very possibly never ship. With Java and C# a mediocre coder
> is much more likely to be able to release his poor code - humans being
> humans, such a coder will blame the language for bloat and slowness and
> errors.
>
> If you run across a Java app that's a memory hog, why do you think it's
> the fault of the language? It never occurred to you that it might be the
> programmers? It's not like more than 25% (being charitable) of all
> programmers working today should even be let near a keyboard, after all.
>

well, I think it actually partly goes both ways.

while many programmers do suck... both Java and C# implement things in 
many cases, in ways which are fairly costly...


for example, in C, a string is just a glob of 8-bit characters in 
memory, and so doesn't really take much more memory than the space to 
store these characters.

in Java, a "String" is a class instance containing an array of 16-bit 
characters...

just at the outset, this is a good deal more expensive (I calculated for 
my own technology, reaching an approx 7x difference for the memory cost 
of storing the string "Hello"). granted, the JVM may have a lower base 
overhead, and it will drop and approach 2x as the string gets longer (a 
lot of the overhead was mostly related to the cost of the object 
instance and array headers).

but, even 2x is still a significant space overhead... (due to UTF-16 vs 
UTF-8...).


also, there are many places internally where "new" will be used in 
copious amounts due to the basic design of the VM architecture, ...

a lot of this is still likely not exactly free either, and a lot of this 
may add up...


or such...

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Managed-Code Bloat Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-06-06 18:47 +1200
  Re: Managed-Code Bloat Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2011-06-06 06:40 -0300
    Re: Managed-Code Bloat Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-06-06 23:04 +1200
      Re: Managed-Code Bloat Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2011-06-06 17:41 -0300
        Re: Managed-Code Bloat Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-06-07 11:13 +1200
          Re: Managed-Code Bloat Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2011-06-07 07:08 -0300
      Re: Managed-Code Bloat Silvio <silvio@moc.com> - 2011-06-07 09:40 +0200
        Re: Managed-Code Bloat Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-06-07 06:08 -0700
  Re: Managed-Code Bloat Joshua Cranmer <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> - 2011-06-06 11:35 -0400
    Re: Managed-Code Bloat Alessio Stalla <alessiostalla@gmail.com> - 2011-06-06 10:47 -0700
      Re: Managed-Code Bloat Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-06-06 18:21 +0000
        Re: Managed-Code Bloat Michael Wojcik <mwojcik@newsguy.com> - 2011-06-08 11:48 -0400
          Re: Managed-Code Bloat Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-06-08 18:06 +0000
            Re: Managed-Code Bloat Michael Wojcik <mwojcik@newsguy.com> - 2011-06-11 14:00 -0400
      Re: Managed-Code Bloat Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-06-07 10:18 +1200
        Re: Managed-Code Bloat Michael Wojcik <mwojcik@newsguy.com> - 2011-06-08 11:59 -0400
      Re: Managed-Code Bloat Michael Wojcik <mwojcik@newsguy.com> - 2011-06-08 11:22 -0400
        Re: Managed-Code Bloat rossum <rossum48@coldmail.com> - 2011-06-08 21:45 +0100
    Re: Managed-Code Bloat Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-06-07 10:17 +1200
      Re: Managed-Code Bloat Joshua Cranmer <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> - 2011-06-06 16:37 -0700
        Re: Managed-Code Bloat Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-06-07 12:06 +1200
          Re: Managed-Code Bloat Joshua Cranmer <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> - 2011-06-06 17:44 -0700
            Re: Managed-Code Bloat Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-06-07 13:38 +1200
              Re: Managed-Code Bloat Joshua Cranmer <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> - 2011-06-06 20:13 -0700
                Re: Managed-Code Bloat Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-06-07 15:41 +1200
                Re: Managed-Code Bloat Joshua Cranmer <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> - 2011-06-06 20:47 -0700
                Re: Managed-Code Bloat BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-07 01:06 -0700
                Re: Managed-Code Bloat Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-06-07 23:53 +1200
                Re: Managed-Code Bloat BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-07 16:04 -0700
                Re: Managed-Code Bloat Michael Wojcik <mwojcik@newsguy.com> - 2011-06-08 13:04 -0400
                Re: Managed-Code Bloat Michal Kleczek <kleku75@gmail.com> - 2011-06-08 09:23 +0200
                Re: Managed-Code Bloat BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-08 03:54 -0700
                Re: Managed-Code Bloat bugbear <bugbear@trim_papermule.co.uk_trim> - 2011-06-07 10:10 +0100
                Re: Managed-Code Bloat BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-07 00:37 -0700
      Re: Managed-Code Bloat Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2011-06-07 07:31 -0300
        Re: Managed-Code Bloat BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-07 16:18 -0700
          Re: Managed-Code Bloat Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2011-06-07 20:50 -0300
          Re: Managed-Code Bloat Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2011-06-08 07:53 -0700
            Re: Managed-Code Bloat BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-08 11:23 -0700
    Re: Managed-Code Bloat BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-06 16:54 -0700
  Re: Managed-Code Bloat Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-06-06 19:24 -0700
    Re: Managed-Code Bloat Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-06-07 15:44 +1200

csiph-web