Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #4342
| From | Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Death To Sub-Sub-Sub-Directories! |
| Followup-To | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Date | 2011-05-20 18:50 +1200 |
| Organization | Geek Central |
| Message-ID | <ir52vs$ups$4@lust.ihug.co.nz> (permalink) |
| References | (7 earlier) <ir0osq$2sg$2@speranza.aioe.org> <ir4d2a$igq$5@lust.ihug.co.nz> <ir4n45$nf4$1@speranza.aioe.org> <ir4nac$ogg$2@lust.ihug.co.nz> <ir4q49$t2e$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
Followups directed to: comp.lang.java.programmer
In message <ir4q49$t2e$1@speranza.aioe.org>, John Silverstein wrote: > On 19/05/2011 11:31 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: > >> In message<ir4n45$nf4$1@speranza.aioe.org>, John Silverstein wrote: >> >>> On 19/05/2011 8:36 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: >>> >>>> In message<ir0osq$2sg$2@speranza.aioe.org>, John Silverstein wrote: >>>> >>>>> If someone puts that in their usenet >>>>> post, but no X-No-Archive: Yes header, and Google then shows ads >>>>> alongside it in Google Groups, can Google be sued? >>>> >>>> X-No-Archive makes no difference. >>> >>> Its absence could be interpreted as granting Usenet archives an implicit >>> reproduction license under attribution-noderivs like terms. >> >> Except, since it says no such thing, no. > > Wrong. It's become a norm that Usenet posts can be retained and, without > modification except to add Xref etc. headers, redistributed: Say who?
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar
Re: Death To Sub-Sub-Sub-Directories! Pitch <mail@fake.info> - 2011-05-11 10:53 +0200
Re: Death To Sub-Sub-Sub-Directories! Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-11 08:57 -0400
Re: Death To Sub-Sub-Sub-Directories! Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2011-05-11 19:16 +0200
Re: Death To Sub-Sub-Sub-Directories! Pitch <mail@fake.info> - 2011-05-12 11:02 +0200
Re: Death To Sub-Sub-Sub-Directories! Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-12 08:28 -0400
Re: Death To Sub-Sub-Sub-Directories! Pitch <mail@fake.info> - 2011-05-13 11:43 +0200
Re: Death To Sub-Sub-Sub-Directories! Michael Wojcik <mwojcik@newsguy.com> - 2011-05-18 08:09 -0400
Re: Death To Sub-Sub-Sub-Directories! John Silverstein <js19375@ymail.cox> - 2011-05-18 11:33 -0400
Re: Death To Sub-Sub-Sub-Directories! Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-05-20 12:36 +1200
Re: Death To Sub-Sub-Sub-Directories! John Silverstein <js19375@ymail.cox> - 2011-05-19 23:28 -0400
Re: Death To Sub-Sub-Sub-Directories! Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-05-20 15:31 +1200
Re: Death To Sub-Sub-Sub-Directories! John Silverstein <js19375@ymail.cox> - 2011-05-20 00:19 -0400
Re: Death To Sub-Sub-Sub-Directories! Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-05-20 18:50 +1200
csiph-web