Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register


Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #4342

Re: Death To Sub-Sub-Sub-Directories!

From Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand>
Newsgroups comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject Re: Death To Sub-Sub-Sub-Directories!
Followup-To comp.lang.java.programmer
Date 2011-05-20 18:50 +1200
Organization Geek Central
Message-ID <ir52vs$ups$4@lust.ihug.co.nz> (permalink)
References (7 earlier) <ir0osq$2sg$2@speranza.aioe.org> <ir4d2a$igq$5@lust.ihug.co.nz> <ir4n45$nf4$1@speranza.aioe.org> <ir4nac$ogg$2@lust.ihug.co.nz> <ir4q49$t2e$1@speranza.aioe.org>

Followups directed to: comp.lang.java.programmer

Show all headers | View raw


In message <ir4q49$t2e$1@speranza.aioe.org>, John Silverstein wrote:

> On 19/05/2011 11:31 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
>
>> In message<ir4n45$nf4$1@speranza.aioe.org>, John Silverstein wrote:
>>
>>> On 19/05/2011 8:36 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
>>>
>>>> In message<ir0osq$2sg$2@speranza.aioe.org>, John Silverstein wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> If someone puts that in their usenet
>>>>> post, but no X-No-Archive: Yes header, and Google then shows ads
>>>>> alongside it in Google Groups, can Google be sued?
>>>>
>>>> X-No-Archive makes no difference.
>>>
>>> Its absence could be interpreted as granting Usenet archives an implicit
>>> reproduction license under attribution-noderivs like terms.
>>
>> Except, since it says no such thing, no.
> 
> Wrong. It's become a norm that Usenet posts can be retained and, without
> modification except to add Xref etc. headers, redistributed:

Say who?

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar


Thread

Re: Death To Sub-Sub-Sub-Directories! Pitch <mail@fake.info> - 2011-05-11 10:53 +0200
  Re: Death To Sub-Sub-Sub-Directories! Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-11 08:57 -0400
    Re: Death To Sub-Sub-Sub-Directories! Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2011-05-11 19:16 +0200
    Re: Death To Sub-Sub-Sub-Directories! Pitch <mail@fake.info> - 2011-05-12 11:02 +0200
      Re: Death To Sub-Sub-Sub-Directories! Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-12 08:28 -0400
        Re: Death To Sub-Sub-Sub-Directories! Pitch <mail@fake.info> - 2011-05-13 11:43 +0200
          Re: Death To Sub-Sub-Sub-Directories! Michael Wojcik <mwojcik@newsguy.com> - 2011-05-18 08:09 -0400
            Re: Death To Sub-Sub-Sub-Directories! John Silverstein <js19375@ymail.cox> - 2011-05-18 11:33 -0400
              Re: Death To Sub-Sub-Sub-Directories! Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-05-20 12:36 +1200
                Re: Death To Sub-Sub-Sub-Directories! John Silverstein <js19375@ymail.cox> - 2011-05-19 23:28 -0400
                Re: Death To Sub-Sub-Sub-Directories! Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-05-20 15:31 +1200
                Re: Death To Sub-Sub-Sub-Directories! John Silverstein <js19375@ymail.cox> - 2011-05-20 00:19 -0400
                Re: Death To Sub-Sub-Sub-Directories! Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-05-20 18:50 +1200

csiph-web