Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register

Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #4042

Re: Death To Sub-Sub-Sub-Directories!

Show all headers | View raw

In article <iqgjol$al8$1@news.albasani.net>, "Lew" says...
> 
> On 05/12/2011 05:02 AM, Pitch wrote:
> > In article<iqe14j$eo9$2@news.albasani.net>, "Lew" says...
> >>
> >> Pitch wrote:
> >>> I hate subdirrs as well. All my java-projects [sic] often have only one package
> >>> inside. I like the way .NET classes are configured.
> >>
> >> Stupid attitude.  They're only subdirectories!  And fucking up your Java
> >> package structure because of a coincidental correlation to subdirectories is
> >> monumental folly.  Get out of programming now!
> >
> > I think you didn't understand what I was saying which is somewhat expected from
> > someone who publicly calls other people stupid.
> 
> I am certain that you didn't understand what I was saying, which is that 
> putting everything in a significant Java program into a single package is a 
> stupid choice.

Java program != Java project

I said "project" and I ment that my Java program can contain several java 
projects. It's called modularity and encapsulation. ;)

>  Packages exist for a reason.  They provide organization, 
> modularity and encapsulation.  Putting everything in a single package is only 
> marginally better than using just the default package.

I never said everything should be in a single package. You should read more 
carefully. I said my projects (which are modules) often (not always) have only 
one package, like "com.mycompany.myproduct.mymodule".

But all those files do not really need to reside in the path
/src/com/mycompany/myproduct/mymodule

They can all be in the "src" directory and still keep the original package.


> You probably should leave programming, too.

Now, that would be stupid since I'm a very good programmer. :)



-- 
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: Death To Sub-Sub-Sub-Directories! Pitch <mail@fake.info> - 2011-05-11 10:53 +0200
  Re: Death To Sub-Sub-Sub-Directories! Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-11 08:57 -0400
    Re: Death To Sub-Sub-Sub-Directories! Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2011-05-11 19:16 +0200
    Re: Death To Sub-Sub-Sub-Directories! Pitch <mail@fake.info> - 2011-05-12 11:02 +0200
      Re: Death To Sub-Sub-Sub-Directories! Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-12 08:28 -0400
        Re: Death To Sub-Sub-Sub-Directories! Pitch <mail@fake.info> - 2011-05-13 11:43 +0200
          Re: Death To Sub-Sub-Sub-Directories! Michael Wojcik <mwojcik@newsguy.com> - 2011-05-18 08:09 -0400
            Re: Death To Sub-Sub-Sub-Directories! John Silverstein <js19375@ymail.cox> - 2011-05-18 11:33 -0400
              Re: Death To Sub-Sub-Sub-Directories! Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-05-20 12:36 +1200
                Re: Death To Sub-Sub-Sub-Directories! John Silverstein <js19375@ymail.cox> - 2011-05-19 23:28 -0400
                Re: Death To Sub-Sub-Sub-Directories! Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-05-20 15:31 +1200
                Re: Death To Sub-Sub-Sub-Directories! John Silverstein <js19375@ymail.cox> - 2011-05-20 00:19 -0400
                Re: Death To Sub-Sub-Sub-Directories! Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-05-20 18:50 +1200

csiph-web