Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #4275
| From | thingamabob <thingamabob117@gmai1.c0m> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c++, comp.lang.php, comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Nslookup |
| Date | 2011-05-19 01:27 -0400 |
| Organization | ACME inc. |
| Message-ID | <ir29nt$mag$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | (4 earlier) <iqsi6l$8l1$1@news.albasani.net> <2pydnQEfsN0cGE7QnZ2dnUVZ8g-dnZ2d@brightview.co.uk> <ir0umq$gtk$1@news.albasani.net> <d7b5eab2-7bf9-4dfa-9246-e3c259c69dc4@v10g2000yqn.googlegroups.com> <ir1h20$q1o$1@news.albasani.net> |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
On 18/05/2011 6:26 PM, Lew wrote: 2> Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.php,comp.lang.java.programmer 2> Michael Doubez wrote: 2>> Argumentum ad misericordiam Argumentum ad listoffallaciesum. 2> Misidentification of fallacy. Classic pontification. 2> I'd already made the point that it's 2> relevant to one of the groups to which the OP posted, namely 2> clj.programmer. Classic erroneous presupposition. Besides which, that still does not essay its relevance to either of the other two newsgroups -- nor the relevance of your own post to any of the three. 2> The "programmer" part of that means that it's not about 2> the language as such, but the skills needed to use it effectively. Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. I think most of us here expect traffic to be on the topic of Java, or at the very least the JVM. 2> I had argued that the question is relevant there. What does your argument have to do with C++ or PHP, Lew? 2> The appeal to sympathy is to show that the line was being drawn 2> arbitrarily fine. What does your appeal to sympathy have to do with C++, PHP, or Java, Lew? 2> Nowhere am I suggesting that the discussion veer from the subject 2> of the newsgroup, Since the subject of the newsgroup is Java, your statement is erroneous. 2> I only suggest that people not be such namby-pamby nitpickers and be 2> so doggedly exclusionary. Classic erroneous presupposition. 2> So while you show off your Latin quite nicely, it's irrelevant. How ironic. 2> I don't know where your "here" is, but in this thread I'm arguing 2> against the people who are NOT being "so helpful". How ironic. 2>> If it wasn't the case you wouldn't be able to ask your question here 2>> because everybody would be too busy chatting and exchanging reciepes. Classic slippery slope fallacy. You can add that to your collection of fallacies, if it isn't already there. 2> And also the OP is being invited EXACTLY to continue to post "here" for 2> one value of "here". By one person, Lew. And he's crossposting to two other groups, Lew. 2> You unsympathetic so-and-so. Who is "You unsympathetic so-and-so", Lew? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that alias. 2> (Ad hominem - in case you want to show off more Latin.) What does your Latin have to do with C++, PHP, or Java, Lew?
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Nslookup Joe Snodgrass <joe.snod@yahoo.com> - 2011-05-16 05:39 -0700
Re: Nslookup "Fred Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@KVI.nl> - 2011-05-16 14:56 +0200
Re: Nslookup Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-16 13:22 -0400
Re: Nslookup red floyd <redfloyd@gmail.com> - 2011-05-16 16:06 -0700
Re: Nslookup Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-16 21:15 -0400
Re: Nslookup bugbear <bugbear@trim_papermule.co.uk_trim> - 2011-05-18 09:38 +0100
Re: Nslookup Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-18 13:13 -0400
Re: Nslookup Michael Doubez <michael.doubez@free.fr> - 2011-05-18 14:26 -0700
Re: Nslookup Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-18 18:26 -0400
Re: Nslookup thingamabob <thingamabob117@gmai1.c0m> - 2011-05-19 01:27 -0400
Re: Nslookup Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2011-05-19 10:01 +0200
Re: Nslookup thingamabob <thingamabob117@gmai1.c0m> - 2011-05-19 12:40 -0400
Re: Nslookup dougatmilmacdotcom@example.com (Doug Miller) - 2011-05-19 17:15 +0000
Re: Nslookup thingamabob <thingamabob117@gmai1.c0m> - 2011-05-19 13:25 -0400
Re: Nslookup Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2011-05-19 13:45 -0400
Re: Nslookup thingamabob <thingamabob117@gmai1.c0m> - 2011-05-19 14:04 -0400
Re: Nslookup dougatmilmacdotcom@example.com (Doug Miller) - 2011-05-19 18:31 +0000
Re: Nslookup thingamabob <thingamabob117@gmai1.c0m> - 2011-05-19 14:45 -0400
Re: Nslookup Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2011-05-19 21:43 -0400
Re: Nslookup thingamabob <thingamabob117@gmai1.c0m> - 2011-05-20 00:07 -0400
Re: Nslookup The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2011-05-19 11:19 +0100
Re: Nslookup Michael Doubez <michael.doubez@free.fr> - 2011-05-19 00:42 -0700
Re: Nslookup Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-19 10:03 -0400
Re: Nslookup thingamabob <thingamabob117@gmai1.c0m> - 2011-05-19 12:44 -0400
Re: Nslookup Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-19 10:08 -0400
Re: Nslookup Michael Doubez <michael.doubez@free.fr> - 2011-05-20 00:55 -0700
Re: Nslookup bugbear <bugbear@trim_papermule.co.uk_trim> - 2011-05-19 09:33 +0100
Re: Nslookup The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2011-05-19 11:21 +0100
Re: Nslookup Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2011-05-16 22:24 -0400
Re: Nslookup Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-17 00:19 -0400
Re: Nslookup Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2011-05-17 07:01 -0400
Re: Nslookup Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-17 07:22 -0400
Re: Nslookup The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2011-05-17 14:07 +0100
Re: Nslookup Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2011-05-17 12:32 -0400
Re: Nslookup Bill B <me@privacy.net> - 2011-05-17 07:29 -0400
Re: Nslookup Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2011-05-17 08:18 -0400
Re: Nslookup Bill B <me@privacy.net> - 2011-05-17 08:30 -0400
Re: Nslookup Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2011-05-17 10:31 -0400
Re: Nslookup Bill B <me@privacy.net> - 2011-05-17 11:10 -0400
Re: Nslookup The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2011-05-17 16:20 +0100
Re: Nslookup Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2011-05-17 12:31 -0400
Re: Nslookup Tim Streater <timstreater@waitrose.com> - 2011-05-17 17:55 +0100
Re: Nslookup The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2011-05-17 14:08 +0100
Re: Nslookup The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2011-05-16 17:23 +0100
Re: Nslookup Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-05-17 09:06 +1200
Re: Nslookup Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-05-16 21:36 -0700
Re: Nslookup Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-05-17 16:50 +1200
Re: Nslookup Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-05-16 23:02 -0700
Re: Nslookup Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-05-17 19:09 +1200
Re: Nslookup Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-05-17 08:52 +0000
Re: Nslookup Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-05-18 13:07 +1200
Re: Nslookup RedGrittyBrick <RedGrittyBrick@spamweary.invalid> - 2011-05-17 17:48 +0100
csiph-web