Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register


Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #4275

Re: Nslookup

From thingamabob <thingamabob117@gmai1.c0m>
Newsgroups comp.lang.c++, comp.lang.php, comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject Re: Nslookup
Date 2011-05-19 01:27 -0400
Organization ACME inc.
Message-ID <ir29nt$mag$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink)
References (4 earlier) <iqsi6l$8l1$1@news.albasani.net> <2pydnQEfsN0cGE7QnZ2dnUVZ8g-dnZ2d@brightview.co.uk> <ir0umq$gtk$1@news.albasani.net> <d7b5eab2-7bf9-4dfa-9246-e3c259c69dc4@v10g2000yqn.googlegroups.com> <ir1h20$q1o$1@news.albasani.net>

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


On 18/05/2011 6:26 PM, Lew wrote:
2> Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.php,comp.lang.java.programmer

2> Michael Doubez wrote:
2>> Argumentum ad misericordiam

Argumentum ad listoffallaciesum.

2> Misidentification of fallacy.

Classic pontification.

2> I'd already made the point that it's
2> relevant to one of the groups to which the OP posted, namely
2> clj.programmer.

Classic erroneous presupposition. Besides which, that still does not 
essay its relevance to either of the other two newsgroups -- nor the 
relevance of your own post to any of the three.

2> The "programmer" part of that means that it's not about
2> the language as such, but the skills needed to use it effectively.

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. I think most of us here 
expect traffic to be on the topic of Java, or at the very least the JVM.

2> I had argued that the question is relevant there.

What does your argument have to do with C++ or PHP, Lew?

2> The appeal to sympathy is to show that the line was being drawn
2> arbitrarily fine.

What does your appeal to sympathy have to do with C++, PHP, or Java, Lew?

2> Nowhere am I suggesting that the discussion veer from the subject
2> of the newsgroup,

Since the subject of the newsgroup is Java, your statement is erroneous.

2> I only suggest that people not be such namby-pamby nitpickers and be
2> so doggedly exclusionary.

Classic erroneous presupposition.

2> So while you show off your Latin quite nicely, it's irrelevant.

How ironic.

2> I don't know where your "here" is, but in this thread I'm arguing
2> against the people who are NOT being "so helpful".

How ironic.

2>> If it wasn't the case you wouldn't be able to ask your question here
2>> because everybody would be too busy chatting and exchanging reciepes.

Classic slippery slope fallacy. You can add that to your collection of 
fallacies, if it isn't already there.

2> And also the OP is being invited EXACTLY to continue to post "here" for
2> one value of "here".

By one person, Lew. And he's crossposting to two other groups, Lew.

2> You unsympathetic so-and-so.

Who is "You unsympathetic so-and-so", Lew? There is nobody in this 
newsgroup using that alias.

2> (Ad hominem - in case you want to show off more Latin.)

What does your Latin have to do with C++, PHP, or Java, Lew?

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Nslookup Joe Snodgrass <joe.snod@yahoo.com> - 2011-05-16 05:39 -0700
  Re: Nslookup "Fred Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@KVI.nl> - 2011-05-16 14:56 +0200
    Re: Nslookup Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-16 13:22 -0400
      Re: Nslookup red floyd <redfloyd@gmail.com> - 2011-05-16 16:06 -0700
        Re: Nslookup Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-16 21:15 -0400
          Re: Nslookup bugbear <bugbear@trim_papermule.co.uk_trim> - 2011-05-18 09:38 +0100
            Re: Nslookup Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-18 13:13 -0400
              Re: Nslookup Michael Doubez <michael.doubez@free.fr> - 2011-05-18 14:26 -0700
                Re: Nslookup Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-18 18:26 -0400
                Re: Nslookup thingamabob <thingamabob117@gmai1.c0m> - 2011-05-19 01:27 -0400
                Re: Nslookup Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2011-05-19 10:01 +0200
                Re: Nslookup thingamabob <thingamabob117@gmai1.c0m> - 2011-05-19 12:40 -0400
                Re: Nslookup dougatmilmacdotcom@example.com (Doug Miller) - 2011-05-19 17:15 +0000
                Re: Nslookup thingamabob <thingamabob117@gmai1.c0m> - 2011-05-19 13:25 -0400
                Re: Nslookup Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2011-05-19 13:45 -0400
                Re: Nslookup thingamabob <thingamabob117@gmai1.c0m> - 2011-05-19 14:04 -0400
                Re: Nslookup dougatmilmacdotcom@example.com (Doug Miller) - 2011-05-19 18:31 +0000
                Re: Nslookup thingamabob <thingamabob117@gmai1.c0m> - 2011-05-19 14:45 -0400
                Re: Nslookup Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2011-05-19 21:43 -0400
                Re: Nslookup thingamabob <thingamabob117@gmai1.c0m> - 2011-05-20 00:07 -0400
                Re: Nslookup The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2011-05-19 11:19 +0100
                Re: Nslookup Michael Doubez <michael.doubez@free.fr> - 2011-05-19 00:42 -0700
                Re: Nslookup Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-19 10:03 -0400
                Re: Nslookup thingamabob <thingamabob117@gmai1.c0m> - 2011-05-19 12:44 -0400
                Re: Nslookup Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-19 10:08 -0400
                Re: Nslookup Michael Doubez <michael.doubez@free.fr> - 2011-05-20 00:55 -0700
              Re: Nslookup bugbear <bugbear@trim_papermule.co.uk_trim> - 2011-05-19 09:33 +0100
                Re: Nslookup The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2011-05-19 11:21 +0100
        Re: Nslookup Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2011-05-16 22:24 -0400
          Re: Nslookup Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-17 00:19 -0400
            Re: Nslookup Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2011-05-17 07:01 -0400
              Re: Nslookup Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-17 07:22 -0400
                Re: Nslookup The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2011-05-17 14:07 +0100
                Re: Nslookup Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2011-05-17 12:32 -0400
              Re: Nslookup Bill B <me@privacy.net> - 2011-05-17 07:29 -0400
                Re: Nslookup Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2011-05-17 08:18 -0400
                Re: Nslookup Bill B <me@privacy.net> - 2011-05-17 08:30 -0400
                Re: Nslookup Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2011-05-17 10:31 -0400
                Re: Nslookup Bill B <me@privacy.net> - 2011-05-17 11:10 -0400
                Re: Nslookup The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2011-05-17 16:20 +0100
                Re: Nslookup Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2011-05-17 12:31 -0400
                Re: Nslookup Tim Streater <timstreater@waitrose.com> - 2011-05-17 17:55 +0100
                Re: Nslookup The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2011-05-17 14:08 +0100
  Re: Nslookup The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2011-05-16 17:23 +0100
  Re: Nslookup Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-05-17 09:06 +1200
  Re: Nslookup Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-05-16 21:36 -0700
    Re: Nslookup Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-05-17 16:50 +1200
      Re: Nslookup Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-05-16 23:02 -0700
        Re: Nslookup Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-05-17 19:09 +1200
          Re: Nslookup Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-05-17 08:52 +0000
            Re: Nslookup Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-05-18 13:07 +1200
          Re: Nslookup RedGrittyBrick <RedGrittyBrick@spamweary.invalid> - 2011-05-17 17:48 +0100

csiph-web