Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #4007
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.albasani.net!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Java puzzler |
| Date | Thu, 12 May 2011 08:35:54 -0400 |
| Organization | albasani.net |
| Lines | 72 |
| Message-ID | <iqgk77$bl9$1@news.albasani.net> (permalink) |
| References | <871987d9-1034-441d-9d33-b2dd6b4de234@glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com> <jhnks6dpk9bjoh7q2gougt0m6ove9etbuq@4ax.com> <iqe1m8$g5e$1@news.albasani.net> <iqe8sr$5p1$1@dont-email.me> <bnpms6lg49p24m2l8taeo51o2pq408uprj@4ax.com> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| X-Trace | news.albasani.net AJWLNVydevlJT4WCxG8Si4W+HoutaImniWTui3IpiRmFAb9uG6uuss59tAMDfY+BpmuIRXOzUYCKovdjvagTCzbmQN352tg2QdaipihhOfxdnjJ1xwcCpcGeVAbEdKzp |
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Thu, 12 May 2011 12:35:51 +0000 (UTC) |
| Injection-Info | news.albasani.net; logging-data="DbM2SlMordHXyGxCXDCMOW0asoRfHGFjmHGPN0e14VEiJ0WU//1WASu3oshfeMieqXy+X2dOFgRhnj8IWa12fvwHGyZp8sGgAudHnF47bg3OeVa98PJF3CM2TKjQLjC7"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@albasani.net" |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110424 Thunderbird/3.1.10 |
| In-Reply-To | <bnpms6lg49p24m2l8taeo51o2pq408uprj@4ax.com> |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:9BPTLKwIZsXJjVaR21JD65SnWpM= |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:4007 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 05/12/2011 01:02 AM, Roedy Green wrote: > On Wed, 11 May 2011 08:10:16 -0700, markspace<-@.> wrote, quoted or > indirectly quoted someone who said : > >> Actually I took that as a compliment. He's saying other people know the >> language better than him. > > Of course. Surely Lew knows the high esteem I hold Patricia Shanahan. > See http://mindprod.com/jgloss/who.html > > I mentioned Lew in the same sentence. That is high praise. > > When I read the JLS, it always seems to me extremely ambiguous. I > would never trust my interpretation. Others seem to understand its > language patterns more deeply and with confidence divine what it > means. It may be that they have done more experiments and have at a > gut level learned the sort of language Mr. Gosling uses. > > To me it seems highly reckless to trust my own interpretation of the > JLS. It must be supplemented with some experiments for verification. > > I have learned that people like Patricia and Lew can make > pronouncements apparently based on nothing but the JLS that are > remarkably accurate. To me this seems an almost magical ability, like > being able to see in the pitch dark. > > Lew thinks everyone should have his skill and are just being lazy if > they don't. I think his ability is quite rare. > > The basic disagreement is Lew wants people to attempt to understand > the JLS on a routine basis. In contrast, I don't want people to trust > their interpretations. They should do experiments too, and/or consult > people with high skill. > > Interpreting the JLS is a special skill quite different from > programming. If you cannot even TRY to understand the JLS, you should not program in Java. The JLS is the ultimate authority on the Java language. You keep suggesting that a person shouldn't even /attempt/ to understand it unless you have a rare or special skill to read the specification. Bullshit. You think I have a special skill at reading it. Sure - it's called "spending time reading, studying and thinking about the JLS". Anyone who can program can do that. Anyone who won't do that shouldn't program. Even you, Roedy, can understand the JLS if you work at it. I'm fairly confident that I'm not all that much smarter than you are. I do NOT suggest that one use the JLS as one's only source of information. That would be stupid. I urge all Java programmers to spend the time and effort to understand the JLS, using other works to deepen your understanding, show how to apply it, and explain rationales. Telling yourself that Lew has a "magical ability" is a foolish fiction. I just am not lazy about the JLS. Maybe Patricia has one; I can believe that. Not me. I'm smart, but the key is I'M AT LEAST TRYING! Roedy, if you cannot understand the JLS you should take down your Java advice from mindprod.com until you do. OK, I'm not serious, since your advice is 99% fabulous (and your picture reveals that you are a surprisingly handsome man, BTW), but really, Roedy, you do yourself a disservice let alone everyone else. Sure, the JLS can be opaque in parts in its efforts at precision. But keep at it - it is, after all, the only and ultimate source of Java language truth. -- Lew Honi soit qui mal y pense. http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/cf/Friz.jpg
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Java puzzler Gábor Bakos <aborgabor@gmail.com> - 2011-05-10 16:36 -0700
Re: Java puzzler Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-10 20:16 -0400
Re: Java puzzler Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-05-11 03:03 -0700
Re: Java puzzler Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-11 09:07 -0400
Re: Java puzzler markspace <-@.> - 2011-05-11 08:10 -0700
Re: Java puzzler Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-05-11 22:02 -0700
Re: Java puzzler Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-12 08:35 -0400
Re: Java puzzler Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-05-12 08:13 -0700
Re: Java puzzler Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-12 12:11 -0400
Re: Java puzzler Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-05-12 18:28 -0700
Re: Java puzzler Joshua Cranmer <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> - 2011-05-12 10:14 -0400
Re: Java puzzler Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-05-11 21:49 -0700
csiph-web