Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #3968
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.albasani.net!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Concurrent bidirectional one-to-many map? |
| Date | Wed, 11 May 2011 09:00:23 -0400 |
| Organization | albasani.net |
| Lines | 39 |
| Message-ID | <iqe195$eo9$3@news.albasani.net> (permalink) |
| References | <iq1kf0$ee2$1@news.albasani.net> <iq1mmc$hbv$1@dont-email.me> <iq348b$iv1$1@news.albasani.net> <nsadnUZcjoF01ljQnZ2dnUVZ_gednZ2d@earthlink.com> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1105080428540.28763@urchin.earth.li> <08586289-8935-4532-93d0-e8c7dd45cb24@c1g2000yqe.googlegroups.com> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1105091825310.18864@urchin.earth.li> <iq9kf7$fr1$1@news.albasani.net> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1105100824001.25309@urchin.earth.li> <iqdg8g$aao$1@news.albasani.net> <iqdinb$fjv$1@news.albasani.net> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| X-Trace | news.albasani.net OffCsC8ERCav7B5i5LyUeJkgs03M40jaJhbvd1dbAYQSXZftpKk/reuvx+L777ST84eDCzEmGPiEdGfZHfTovdo069bceBBniTnCB6QN6KLWk6h2YM8S/wc3Aayp9v5i |
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Wed, 11 May 2011 13:00:22 +0000 (UTC) |
| Injection-Info | news.albasani.net; logging-data="XatB/8ASZJMCbiCxi62gIW6xrAj5TEFZyqgs5J7OlFU3upECQ0NC7YqU1bMDKJ9NHAev+/++tNpTmxobv0n2Y9VeN4zrN3Atm4OhOI6bUJx3DYS3Hztm8lDbofNL/afV"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@albasani.net" |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110424 Thunderbird/3.1.10 |
| In-Reply-To | <iqdinb$fjv$1@news.albasani.net> |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:235Es3HQxrpDfdn2CB9J/sVlyOo= |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:3968 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 05/11/2011 04:51 AM, Sebastian wrote:
> Am 11.05.2011 10:09, schrieb Sebastian:
>>
>>
>> Here's a bit of the WorkspaceManager code referred to above:
>>
>> public void closeWorkspace( UUID id )
>> {
>> writeLock.lock(); // <<<<<<<<<<< necessary ?
>> try {
>> Workspace wp = wpMap.remove( id );
>> ...
>
> As afterthought to my immediately preceding post,
> let me add that it would be nice if we could process
> unrelated workspaces in parallel. How about having a
> ReentrantReadWriteLock associated with each workspace,
> and using themlike this:
>
> Workspace wp = wpMap.get( id );
> wp.writeLock.lock();
> try {
> wpMap.remove( id );
> ...
>
> Wouldn't this improve things?
Why have you never answered my questions about long locks?
You seem to be going through a lot of gyrations unnecessarily. Just lock the
data you need to lock.
It's kind of rude that you ask for help but don't respond to requests for
further information.
--
Lew
Honi soit qui mal y pense.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/cf/Friz.jpg
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Concurrent bidirectional one-to-many map? Sebastian <sebastian@undisclosed.invalid> - 2011-05-06 22:07 +0200
Re: Concurrent bidirectional one-to-many map? markspace <-@.> - 2011-05-06 13:45 -0700
Re: Concurrent bidirectional one-to-many map? Sebastian <sebastian@undisclosed.invalid> - 2011-05-07 11:43 +0200
Re: Concurrent bidirectional one-to-many map? Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-07 07:59 -0400
Re: Concurrent bidirectional one-to-many map? Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-07 12:49 -0400
Re: Concurrent bidirectional one-to-many map? Sebastian <sebastian@undisclosed.invalid> - 2011-05-07 21:34 +0200
Re: Concurrent bidirectional one-to-many map? Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-05-07 06:40 -0700
Re: Concurrent bidirectional one-to-many map? Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> - 2011-05-08 04:51 +0100
Re: Concurrent bidirectional one-to-many map? Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-05-09 06:43 -0700
Re: Concurrent bidirectional one-to-many map? Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> - 2011-05-09 18:28 +0100
Re: Concurrent bidirectional one-to-many map? Sebastian <sebastian@undisclosed.invalid> - 2011-05-09 22:57 +0200
Re: Concurrent bidirectional one-to-many map? Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-09 18:36 -0400
Re: Concurrent bidirectional one-to-many map? Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> - 2011-05-10 08:34 +0100
Re: Concurrent bidirectional one-to-many map? Sebastian <sebastian@undisclosed.invalid> - 2011-05-11 10:09 +0200
Re: Concurrent bidirectional one-to-many map? Sebastian <sebastian@undisclosed.invalid> - 2011-05-11 10:51 +0200
Re: Concurrent bidirectional one-to-many map? Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-05-11 04:55 -0700
Re: Concurrent bidirectional one-to-many map? Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-11 09:00 -0400
Re: Concurrent bidirectional one-to-many map? Sebastian <sebastian@undisclosed.invalid> - 2011-05-11 20:47 +0200
Re: Concurrent bidirectional one-to-many map? markspace <-@.> - 2011-05-07 09:35 -0700
Re: Concurrent bidirectional one-to-many map? Michal Kleczek <kleku75@gmail.com> - 2011-05-09 16:42 +0200
Re: Concurrent bidirectional one-to-many map? Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-05-07 03:46 -0700
csiph-web