Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #3938
| From | Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: streaming problem and thread freeze |
| Date | 2011-05-10 17:26 -0400 |
| Organization | albasani.net |
| Message-ID | <iqcah2$lr1$1@news.albasani.net> (permalink) |
| References | <005a9e79-36fe-4bf1-aa1d-bda3a5aaebf2@glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com> <iq9ai7$t2s$1@dont-email.me> <iqabig$i1u$1@lust.ihug.co.nz> <iqc30a$414$2@dont-email.me> |
On 05/10/2011 03:17 PM, Daniele Futtorovic wrote:
> On 10/05/2011 05:31, Lawrence D'Oliveiro allegedly wrote:
>> In message<iq9ai7$t2s$1@dont-email.me>, Daniele Futtorovic wrote:
>>
>>> Secondly, although it is only a minor thing and only my personal
>>> opinion, this:
>>>
>>> } catch (IOException ex) {
>>> log.severe(ex.getMessage());
>>> }
>>>
>>> is a *very* bad idea. Log the full stack.
>>
>> It would be so much easier if you could simply not bother to catch the
>> exception at all, and let your program crash with a full stack trace.
>
> It would be yet much easier, as you perhaps one day will learn, to realise
> that checked exceptions are not a bother, but an almost invaluable tool.
>
> And in cases you have to do something dirty, you can still simply throw an Error.
You raise a good, if classically controversial, point, the overarching
question of how properly to use exceptions. I, too, am partisan to the
checked exception from two perspectives - that of the maintainer, and that of
the API designer. You don't have to use them, given the rich hierarchy of
Throwables, but they sure can be useful.
Complaints about checked exceptions come pretty much exclusively from
programmers using APIs that require'em. Hmm. I recommend to such folks that
they consider a question, "What purpose does this particular checked exception
serve in the method contract?"
Whether you agree or not, the API designer had an answer to that question.
They have ensured that all clients benefit from their reasoning.
API designers that make different decisions might use runtime exceptions or
some other mechanism.
It's not really a bad thing nor even confusing to a reasonably-trained
programmer to have 'catch' blocks all over the place, no more than the similar
amount of decision blocks one needs for thorough, professional programming.
Code that serves a purpose isn't bloat, and code that creates a reliable
invariant isn't a digression.
If you can't stand the heat, get out of the kitchen.
--
Lew
Honi soit qui mal y pense.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/cf/Friz.jpg
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
streaming problem and thread freeze Fly <flavio80@gmail.com> - 2011-05-09 07:56 -0700
Re: streaming problem and thread freeze Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2011-05-09 20:08 +0200
Re: streaming problem and thread freeze Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-05-10 15:31 +1200
Re: streaming problem and thread freeze markspace <-@.> - 2011-05-10 04:47 -0700
Re: streaming problem and thread freeze Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-10 08:52 -0400
Re: streaming problem and thread freeze Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2011-05-10 21:17 +0200
Re: streaming problem and thread freeze Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-10 17:26 -0400
Re: streaming problem and thread freeze Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2011-05-11 18:55 +0200
Re: streaming problem and thread freeze Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-05-11 14:06 +1200
Re: streaming problem and thread freeze Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-11 09:02 -0400
csiph-web