Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #3602

O/T: Awesome vocabulary (Was: should I use java.awt.* only or also use javax.swing in applets?)

Path	csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.albasani.net!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From	Lew <noone@lewscanon.com>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject	O/T: Awesome vocabulary (Was: should I use java.awt.* only or also use javax.swing in applets?)
Date	Thu, 05 May 2011 17:28:36 -0400
Organization	albasani.net
Lines	11
Message-ID	<ipv4q1$pbe$4@news.albasani.net> (permalink)
References	<ba0c3c4d-cf9e-4b1b-82a8-30b84405b915@17g2000prr.googlegroups.com> <h%kwp.57959$0s5.42695@newsfe17.iad> <nospam-85654B.12160105052011@news.aioe.org> <ipun5u$2v1$1@dont-email.me> <nospam-A3001A.17200805052011@news.aioe.org>
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
X-Trace	news.albasani.net 0Ol2R5JLiaUenUBDNPydnh/pYkmUXlOiLTtPDyrmuTRl8cWovuYrn9QKVelMPauD0RXq2tA3e4ZHorxqCIFCLg==
NNTP-Posting-Date	Thu, 5 May 2011 21:28:34 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info	news.albasani.net; logging-data="0N4AlW3oH/IFFF1QzHxB7jgivMg7UFtHWJFNxoXlJQQxEO1CIY1nd7ulL2+DnqsFtHAn6GgkL73aI4W3eOSVl4T2tcFppJtg1ao0jwmRpg1tnm42rRN4IwWZEJAzeBKM"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@albasani.net"
User-Agent	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.14) Gecko/20110223 Thunderbird/3.1.8
In-Reply-To	<nospam-A3001A.17200805052011@news.aioe.org>
Cancel-Lock	sha1:7fYzBjrd3FXA43JzkQx/RLOoogI=
Xref	x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:3602

Show key headers only | View raw

John B. Matthews wrote:
> Related bugs are notoriously protean and difficult to reproduce;
                                ^^^^^^^
> diligence is the only defense.

Awesome vocabulary!

-- 
Lew
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proteans_(body_language)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proteus_(comics)

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

should I use java.awt.* only or also use javax.swing in applets? steveh44 <steve_h44@yahoo.com> - 2011-05-04 14:34 -0700
  Re: should I use java.awt.* only or also use javax.swing in applets? Knute Johnson <nospam@knutejohnson.com> - 2011-05-04 16:07 -0700
    Re: should I use java.awt.* only or also use javax.swing in applets? "John B. Matthews" <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2011-05-05 12:16 -0400
      Re: should I use java.awt.* only or also use javax.swing in applets? markspace <-@.> - 2011-05-05 10:35 -0700
        Re: should I use java.awt.* only or also use javax.swing in applets? "John B. Matthews" <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2011-05-05 17:20 -0400
          O/T: Awesome vocabulary (Was: should I use java.awt.* only or also use javax.swing in applets?) Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-05 17:28 -0400
            Re: O/T: Awesome vocabulary (Was: should I use java.awt.* only or also use javax.swing in applets?) Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> - 2011-05-05 23:31 +0100
              Re: O/T: Awesome vocabulary (Was: should I use java.awt.* only or also use javax.swing in applets?) Jim Janney <jjanney@shell.xmission.com> - 2011-05-05 17:02 -0600
          Re: should I use java.awt.* only or also use javax.swing in applets? markspace <-@.> - 2011-05-05 20:05 -0700
  Re: should I use java.awt.* only or also use javax.swing in applets? Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-04 19:10 -0400
  Re: should I use java.awt.* only or also use javax.swing in applets? Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-05-05 16:47 -0700
  Re: should I use java.awt.* only or also use javax.swing in applets? Andrew Thompson <andrewthommo@gmail.com> - 2011-05-06 03:25 -0700
    Re: should I use java.awt.* only or also use javax.swing in applets? Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2011-05-06 19:06 +0200

csiph-web