Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #3370

Re: A question about synchronized threads

Path	csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From	markspace <-@.>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject	Re: A question about synchronized threads
Date	Fri, 29 Apr 2011 19:07:14 -0700
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Lines	19
Message-ID	<ipfqsq$mko$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	<3f249d87-aaf8-4732-9ee8-fd112cf82553@f31g2000pri.googlegroups.com> <68sr88-fuj.ln1@dagon.net> <0f043640-9fb3-430f-bcf6-d830a2dd6e81@k15g2000pri.googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=EUC-KR
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
Injection-Date	Sat, 30 Apr 2011 02:07:22 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info	mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="pYb/yoo+Q58g8sOMt7I33A"; logging-data="23192"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18HLO477w+kQiQBXcFHANUw15apy2qB/58="
User-Agent	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Thunderbird/3.1.9
In-Reply-To	<0f043640-9fb3-430f-bcf6-d830a2dd6e81@k15g2000pri.googlegroups.com>
Cancel-Lock	sha1:AeCQVTQoHEB3M8Sum1bry3HTMOo=
Xref	x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:3370

Show key headers only | View raw

On 4/29/2011 6:49 PM, byhesed wrote:
> 
> Also, although two methods need to be synchronized,
> if two methods are totally unrelated to each other,
> then it would be too bad, isn't it?
> The rate of using CPU resources will be too low.

Be careful with that word "unrelated," things can seem unrelated when
they aren't.  Correct is more important that ineffectual.

However, if it is obvious that the methods could be improved, then sure
it's OK to improve them, and you do seem to have the right track.  I
think we're all just saying that concurrency can be tricky.

I'd would still like to see a complete example class ;-)

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

A question about synchronized threads byhesed <byhesed@gmail.com> - 2011-04-29 08:35 -0700
  Re: A question about synchronized threads Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-04-29 11:53 -0400
    Re: A question about synchronized threads byhesed <byhesed@gmail.com> - 2011-04-29 09:12 -0700
      Re: A question about synchronized threads Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2011-04-29 21:01 -0400
        Re: A question about synchronized threads byhesed <byhesed@gmail.com> - 2011-04-29 18:43 -0700
  Re: A question about synchronized threads Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2011-04-29 17:58 +0200
    Re: A question about synchronized threads byhesed <byhesed@gmail.com> - 2011-04-29 09:09 -0700
      Re: A question about synchronized threads markspace <-@.> - 2011-04-29 11:11 -0700
        Re: A question about synchronized threads Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2011-04-29 20:19 +0200
          Re: A question about synchronized threads markspace <-@.> - 2011-04-29 15:21 -0700
          Re: A question about synchronized threads Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-04-29 21:10 -0700
  Re: A question about synchronized threads dagon@dagon.net (Dagon) - 2011-04-29 15:55 -0700
    Re: A question about synchronized threads Alice <quaxx1108@example.com> - 2011-04-29 20:08 -0400
    Re: A question about synchronized threads markspace <-@.> - 2011-04-29 19:07 -0700
    Re: A question about synchronized threads byhesed <byhesed@gmail.com> - 2011-04-29 18:49 -0700
      Re: A question about synchronized threads Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-03 18:57 -0400
        Re: A question about synchronized threads Deeyana <d.awlberg@hotmail.invalid> - 2011-05-04 00:17 +0000
          Re: A question about synchronized threads Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-04 12:45 -0400
            Re: A question about synchronized threads Deeyana <d.awlberg@hotmail.invalid> - 2011-05-04 19:59 +0000

csiph-web