Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #3179

[OT] Re: Double always returning 0.0

From	Stanimir Stamenkov <s7an10@netscape.net>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject	[OT] Re: Double always returning 0.0
Date	2011-04-21 07:30 +0300
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<ioobsn$i15$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	(5 earlier) <iokioc$kmi$1@news.albasani.net> <2011042013535527735-jasonsavlov@gmailcom> <slrniqu851.phi.avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> <2011042014193994923-jasonsavlov@gmailcom> <ion8m9$oph$1@news.albasani.net>

Show all headers | View raw

Wed, 20 Apr 2011 14:29:35 -0400, /Lew/:

>   public Cat() {
>     super();
>   }
>
> The call to the 'super()' constructor is unnecessary, albeit harmless.

I often want the "default" no-args constructor explicitly declared 
but I've setup my environment to trigger warning for empty 
undocumented blocks like:

   public Cat() {
   }

so I usually write it as:

   public Cat() {
     //super();
   }

The commented out |super()| call (implicitly done by the compiler) 
acting as documentation.

-- 
Stanimir

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Double always returning 0.0 Jason S <jasonsavlov@me.com> - 2011-04-18 20:05 -0400
  Re: Double always returning 0.0 markspace <-@.> - 2011-04-18 17:43 -0700
  Re: Double always returning 0.0 Jim <jkorman@alltel.net> - 2011-04-18 20:11 -0500
  Re: Double always returning 0.0 Screamin Lord Byron <scre@min.dot> - 2011-04-19 11:02 +0200
    Re: Double always returning 0.0 Jason S <jasonsavlov@me.com> - 2011-04-19 11:16 -0400
      Re: Double always returning 0.0 Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-04-19 11:18 -0400
        Re: Double always returning 0.0 Jason S <jasonsavlov@me.com> - 2011-04-19 11:20 -0400
          Re: Double always returning 0.0 Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-04-19 11:57 -0400
          Re: Double always returning 0.0 Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-04-19 16:04 +0000
            Re: Double always returning 0.0 Jason S <jasonsavlov@me.com> - 2011-04-19 17:22 -0400
          Re: Double always returning 0.0 Screamin Lord Byron <scre@min.dot> - 2011-04-19 19:08 +0200
          Re: Double always returning 0.0 Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-04-19 14:03 -0400
            Re: Double always returning 0.0 Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-04-19 14:06 -0400
            Re: Double always returning 0.0 Jason S <jason.savlov@gmail.com> - 2011-04-20 13:53 -0400
              Re: Double always returning 0.0 Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-04-20 18:06 +0000
                Re: Double always returning 0.0 Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-04-20 14:11 -0400
                Re: Double always returning 0.0 Jason S <jason.savlov@gmail.com> - 2011-04-20 14:19 -0400
                Re: Double always returning 0.0 Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-04-20 14:29 -0400
                [OT] Re: Double always returning 0.0 Stanimir Stamenkov <s7an10@netscape.net> - 2011-04-21 07:30 +0300
      Re: Double always returning 0.0 Screamin Lord Byron <scre@min.dot> - 2011-04-19 19:05 +0200
  Re: Double always returning 0.0 Jason S <jasonsavlov@me.com> - 2011-04-19 13:07 -0400
  Re: Double always returning 0.0 Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-04-19 16:30 -0700

csiph-web