Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #3019

Re: Why only public methods on interfaces?

From	"Mike Schilling" <mscottschilling@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject	Re: Why only public methods on interfaces?
Date	2011-04-09 22:28 -0700
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<inrf5h$7ne$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	(3 earlier) <5YSdnThYKPSwAgPQnZ2dnUVZ_gydnZ2d@earthlink.com> <KPCdnfEJDvZ0KAPQnZ2dnUVZ_sqdnZ2d@posted.palinacquisition> <XoGdnZ2ah5Y6iQLQnZ2dnUVZ_jednZ2d@earthlink.com> <TcKdnZsfUbuKhALQnZ2dnUVZ_iydnZ2d@posted.palinacquisition> <58-dnYYCMK1urQLQnZ2dnUVZ_gGdnZ2d@earthlink.com>

Show all headers | View raw


"Patricia Shanahan" <pats@acm.org> wrote in message 
news:58-dnYYCMK1urQLQnZ2dnUVZ_gGdnZ2d@earthlink.com...
>
> The really unfortunate decision is not the public methods only, but the
> decision to make non-specification of access mean public interface
> method declarations but package access in class method declarations.
> That cuts off any possibility of changing interfaces now to make them
> more flexible.

Actually, you could make an argument that "protected" on an interface method 
would mean "only visible within the package", because it can't mean "and 
also visible to derived types".

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Why only public methods on interfaces? kramer31 <kramer.newsreader@gmail.com> - 2011-04-07 17:09 -0700
  Re: Why only public methods on interfaces? Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2011-04-07 21:48 -0300
  Re: Why only public methods on interfaces? Joshua Cranmer <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> - 2011-04-07 21:01 -0400
    Re: Why only public methods on interfaces? v_borchert@despammed.com (Volker Borchert) - 2011-04-08 02:43 +0000
      Re: Why only public methods on interfaces? Joshua Cranmer <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> - 2011-04-08 00:24 -0400
  Re: Why only public methods on interfaces? Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-04-07 21:49 -0700
    Re: Why only public methods on interfaces? Owen Jacobson <angrybaldguy@gmail.com> - 2011-04-08 01:01 -0400
      Re: Why only public methods on interfaces? Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-04-07 22:37 -0700
        Re: Why only public methods on interfaces? Peter Duniho <NpOeStPeAdM@NnOwSlPiAnMk.com> - 2011-04-08 00:14 -0700
          Re: Why only public methods on interfaces? Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-04-08 06:59 -0700
            Re: Why only public methods on interfaces? Peter Duniho <NpOeStPeAdM@NnOwSlPiAnMk.com> - 2011-04-08 07:17 -0700
              Re: Why only public methods on interfaces? Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-04-08 08:59 -0700
                Re: Why only public methods on interfaces? Peter Duniho <NpOeStPeAdM@NnOwSlPiAnMk.com> - 2011-04-08 17:27 -0700
                Re: Why only public methods on interfaces? "Mike Schilling" <mscottschilling@hotmail.com> - 2011-04-09 22:14 -0700
                Re: Why only public methods on interfaces? "Mike Schilling" <mscottschilling@hotmail.com> - 2011-04-09 22:28 -0700
                Re: Why only public methods on interfaces? Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> - 2011-04-10 16:02 +0100
  Re: Why only public methods on interfaces? Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-04-08 03:18 -0700
    Re: Why only public methods on interfaces? Esmond Pitt <esmond.pitt@bigpond.com> - 2011-04-08 20:32 +1000
  Re: Why only public methods on interfaces? Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> - 2011-04-08 20:34 +0100
  Re: Why only public methods on interfaces? Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> - 2011-04-10 18:10 +0100

csiph-web