Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #2795

Re: Cheap way to protect your intellectual property written in java. Compile to native and reduce to the minimum cracking and reverse engineering...

Show all headers | View raw

waldo wrote:
> Hi folks:
>
> Looking to protect your intellectual property in java [sic] against cracking
> and/or hacking?

You cannot even spell the name of the language correctly?

It's only four letters long!

> That is something really hard to accomplish with so many decompilers
> to the point that obfuscators are nothing but a bad joke to stop
> cracking and abuse of your property.

Who's calling whom a bad joke?

> I can offer you an interesting deal to compile your .jar into native

Grammar ...

> to protect it without having to buy a 2000 dollars [sic] professional

Nothing professional here.

> license for the compiler. Something prohibitive for small IT companies
> that are struggling with money losses because of cracking. We

Sentence fragment.

> purchased it for our projects and gained a load of experience while
> doing it. We even use JNI and reflection yet out product is nothing

"out product"?

> but a huge sucess [sic]. So if you want to save some dollars i [sic] am offering

You cannot even spell "I" correctly?

It's only one letter long!

> compilation services for a whole lot less than a license purchase. The

How much less is "a whole lot less", exactly?

> product we purchased lets us also produce trials effortlessly.

And how do we check the result of your work, say to make sure you haven't 
maliciously planted a virus into it, or have it communicating over a back 
channel with terrorists?

> Most of the times only a .jar is what you would be giving me, not the

Or what we'd need.

> sources. Now not everything can be compiled (our product required some
> modification to do so). In that case i [sic] could offer you those services
> as well for a higher price yet lower than a license acquisition.

My God!  You're so generous!

> Depending on you product of course as some could end up being huge.

Sentence fragment.

> In any case i [sic] take the risk of deciding whether your product is
> compilable without modification before any payment.

We take the risk of spending money on a pig in a poke from some illiterate 
stranger who cannot even spell a one-letter word correctly, who spams the 
newsgroup for his unknown presumably crappy product (judging by the pathetic 
marketing spam) and who we know neither as competent nor trustworthy.

Tchyah.

> Interested parties please message me to talk.
>
> With the process you also remove as requirement to deploy your

Grammar.

> software the deployment of a java [sic] virtual machine as it runs native.

Runs native what?

> 32 bits only for now (but works like a charm in 64 bits OS).

And we're supposed to take your word for it?

Again, tchyah.

-- 
Lew
Honi soit qui mal y pense.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/cf/Friz.jpg

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Cheap way to protect your intellectual property written in java. Compile to native and reduce to the minimum cracking and reverse engineering... waldo <waldoalvarez00@gmail.com> - 2011-04-02 19:11 -0700
  Re: Cheap way to protect your intellectual property written in java. Compile to native and reduce to the minimum cracking and reverse engineering... Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-04-03 01:58 -0400
  Re: Cheap way to protect your intellectual property written in java. Compile to native and reduce to the minimum cracking and reverse engineering... Esmond Pitt <esmond.pitt@bigpond.com> - 2011-04-04 09:50 +1000
    Re: Cheap way to protect your intellectual property written in java. Compile to native and reduce to the minimum cracking and reverse engineering... markspace <-@.> - 2011-04-03 17:18 -0700

csiph-web