Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #25978
| From | Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte.net.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: limitations on using enum as generic parameter |
| Date | 2011-02-08 20:47 +0100 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <iis6ki$ad9$1@news.eternal-september.org> (permalink) |
| References | <76e9be77-f846-4559-82ec-1d774a8a6a0b@q36g2000yqn.googlegroups.com> <4d518f96$1@news.x-privat.org> <iis5qe$6o3$1@news.eternal-september.org> <4d519c14$1@news.x-privat.org> |
On 08/02/2011 20:40, Ken Wesson allegedly wrote: > On Tue, 08 Feb 2011 20:33:37 +0100, Daniele Futtorovic wrote: > >> On 08/02/2011 19:46, Ken Wesson allegedly wrote: >>> That's not going to work. It's a static method of a class that isn't >>> determined at this point in the code, so the compiler simply has no >>> clue what to call. Hence the error message. >>> >>> If you really need to do something like this, you'll need to use >>> reflection on a class object. >> >> For the record: no. See my and ninja markspace's replies. > > I meant the general case of wanting to invoke a static method on a type > parameter, where the method depends on the run-time type (so, it's not a > method of X where you have<E extends X>, but a method implemented > differently for each choice of E). I would argue that this would be bad design. Aside from cases where reflection is part of the contract (Spring, for instance), it should only be used exceptionally, if at all. > In the special case of an enum there's getEnumConstants. Which doesn't work via reflection, FWIW.
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: limitations on using enum as generic parameter Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte.net.invalid> - 2011-02-08 20:33 +0100
Re: limitations on using enum as generic parameter Lew <lew@lewscanon.com> - 2011-02-09 10:07 -0800
Re: limitations on using enum as generic parameter Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte.net.invalid> - 2011-02-08 23:44 +0100
Re: limitations on using enum as generic parameter Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte.net.invalid> - 2011-02-08 20:47 +0100
Re: limitations on using enum as generic parameter Lew <lew@lewscanon.com> - 2011-02-08 12:31 -0800
Re: limitations on using enum as generic parameter Ken Wesson <kwesson@gmail.com> - 2011-02-08 20:40 +0100
csiph-web