Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #25808
| From | Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: JLS 3/e -- Lots Of Errors |
| Followup-To | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Date | 2011-02-07 14:17 +1300 |
| Organization | Geek Central |
| Message-ID | <iinh7v$6h2$1@lust.ihug.co.nz> (permalink) |
| References | <iiflvc$keg$2@lust.ihug.co.nz> <iincqj$3tp$2@lust.ihug.co.nz> <I8idncO4-e3h2tLQnZ2dnUVZ_oidnZ2d@earthlink.com> |
Followups directed to: comp.lang.java.programmer
In message <I8idncO4-e3h2tLQnZ2dnUVZ_oidnZ2d@earthlink.com>, Patricia Shanahan wrote: > This raises an interesting issue. If one assumes sequential reading, > each term absolutely must be defined no later than its first use, > because it will not be possible to jump to a later definition. You don’t have to assume sequential reading. It’s usual in language specs to provide a reference for terms like that everywhere they occur outside their defining section, whether before or after. > In practice, I don't think I have ever read a language specification the > way one reads a novel, beginning at the first page and continuing > sequentially to the end. It’s how I do it the first time. Then later I come back to refer to things as I need them. (Though I have to admit the Annotated Ada Reference Manual left me feeling like my brain had turned to mush. Maybe I’ll try the un-annotated version next time...)
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: JLS 3/e -- Lots Of Errors Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-02-06 17:14 -0800
Re: JLS 3/e -- Lots Of Errors Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-02-07 14:17 +1300
Re: JLS 3/e -- Lots Of Errors Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-02-06 20:56 -0500
csiph-web