Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #25487

Re: Java vs C++

From	Lew <noone@lewscanon.com>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject	Re: Java vs C++
Date	2011-02-06 20:07 -0500
Organization	albasani.net
Message-ID	<iingjs$ssp$1@news.albasani.net> (permalink)
References	(5 earlier) <iil5ed$10m$1@news.eternal-september.org> <iimf47$soo$1@news.belwue.de> <iimnes$dh2$1@news.eternal-september.org> <iimo4c$pla$1@news.albasani.net> <iinccr$o1o$1@news.belwue.de>

Show all headers | View raw

Lew wrote:
>> We could end this entire thread right now by conceding that, yes, C++ is
>> clearly the superior language over Java, just like Esperanto is over
>> English, unless, of course, you actually want to accomplish something, but
>> all analogies break down somewhere, right?

Thomas Richter wrote:
> Who said this, and where? I did not mean to say this implication. Java often
> took the path of providing a more accessible language than C++, maybe for good
> reasons since C++ has quite some complexity. But templates are not generics,
> and I'm not aware that you can use them for metaprogramming. Whether you
> *want* to use metaprogramming, well, that's a different question.

When I say, "this entire thread", I'm referring to this entire thread, "Java 
vs C++", as set up by the OP, not you.  Nor was I replying to one of your 
posts.  I fail to see why you think I have an issue with anything you said.

-- 
Lew
Ceci n'est pas une fenêtre.
.___________.
|###] | [###|
|##/  | *\##|
|#/ * |   \#|
|#----|----#|
||    |  * ||
|o *  |    o|
|_____|_____|
|===========|

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next | Find similar

Thread

Re: Java vs C++ Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-02-06 20:07 -0500

csiph-web