Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #25886
| From | Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte.net.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Eclipse vs plugin.jar |
| Date | 2011-01-28 18:41 +0100 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <ihuv37$3r7$1@news.eternal-september.org> (permalink) |
| References | <alpine.DEB.1.10.1101281615580.24197@urchin.earth.li> |
On 28/01/2011 17:23, Tom Anderson allegedly wrote: > Good day! > > We're writing an applet. It does uses LiveConnect to talk to JavaScript > on the page. The classes for that - JSObject and friends - are in > plugin.jar, which can be found in the JRE lib directory. > > We're developing using Eclipse. Eclipse has no idea about plugin.jar. > > What's the right way to teach it? > > We could put a copy of plugin.jar in our project. That's easy, but means > we're not using the installed version, which leaves us vulnerable to > version mismatch if Sun decides to make changes to this decade-old piece > of code. > > We could add an external jar reference. That's also easy, and uses the > installed jar, but involves hardcoding the path to the JRE in the metadata. > > We could use a classpath variable for the JRE's location, and add an > external JAR reference relative to that, which uses the installed jar > and doesn't hardcode the location, but it means everyone has to add a > new variable to their workspace (there isn't a predefined one for > JAVA_HOME or JRE_HOME, annoyingly). > > We could define a 'library', which is some sort of bundle of jars, which > has the disadvantages of all the above approaches, and none of the > advantages. > > Any thoughts? > > tom Firstly, I assume the problem is it doesn't compile, isn't it? Because it should run fine. I'm not using Eclipse anymore these days, so I don't know exactly, but isn't there some point where you define your "platform", viz. the JDK you're using? Wouldn't including the lib in question belong in that step? df.
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar
Re: Eclipse vs plugin.jar Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte.net.invalid> - 2011-01-28 18:41 +0100 Re: Eclipse vs plugin.jar Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> - 2011-01-28 18:10 +0000
csiph-web