Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #38855
| X-Received | by 2002:a0c:9514:: with SMTP id l20mr162674qvl.34.1554315751351; Wed, 03 Apr 2019 11:22:31 -0700 (PDT) |
|---|---|
| X-Received | by 2002:a25:6a43:: with SMTP id f64mr1320384ybc.337.1554315751058; Wed, 03 Apr 2019 11:22:31 -0700 (PDT) |
| Path | csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!feeder.usenetexpress.com!feeder-in1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!t9no2788173qtn.0!news-out.google.com!i54ni1322qte.0!nntp.google.com!t9no2788171qtn.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Date | Wed, 3 Apr 2019 11:22:30 -0700 (PDT) |
| In-Reply-To | <slrnqa9rj9.cfl.avl@logic.at> |
| Complaints-To | groups-abuse@google.com |
| Injection-Info | glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=50.78.95.177; posting-account=2czF5goAAAD4GBMPIGV4KcD2K4PhoB_H |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 50.78.95.177 |
| References | <slrnqa9lo4.cfl.avl@logic.at> <q82ntq$38c$1@dont-email.me> <slrnqa9rj9.cfl.avl@logic.at> |
| User-Agent | G2/1.0 |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Message-ID | <ff666f17-993d-4479-85f7-ed83c1f51ca8@googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| Subject | Re: DefaultTableModel.getDataVector() and Java 11 |
| From | Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> |
| Injection-Date | Wed, 03 Apr 2019 18:22:31 +0000 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset="UTF-8" |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | quoted-printable |
| Lines | 12 |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:38855 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On Wednesday, April 3, 2019 at 1:33:38 PM UTC-4, Andreas Leitgeb wrote: > PS: > Some comment for private method "justifyRows" of DefaultTableModel > that I noticed only in the course of changing to AbstractTableModel > reveals developers' intention: > " // Sometimes the DefaultTableModel is subclassed > " // instead of the AbstractTableModel by mistake. > Yep, I was guilty of that - fixed now in my code. I may have just found that note myself at some point, that the DefaultTableModel is not intended to be overridden. I knew there was a reason I ended up extending the AbstractTableModel, while I know I initially tried to extend the default which seemed like it should be less work.
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
DefaultTableModel.getDataVector() and Java 11 Andreas Leitgeb <avl@logic.at> - 2019-04-03 15:53 +0000
Re: DefaultTableModel.getDataVector() and Java 11 Patrick Roemer <sangamon@netcologne.de> - 2019-04-03 18:37 +0200
Re: DefaultTableModel.getDataVector() and Java 11 Andreas Leitgeb <avl@logic.at> - 2019-04-03 16:41 +0000
Re: DefaultTableModel.getDataVector() and Java 11 Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2019-04-03 12:44 -0400
Re: DefaultTableModel.getDataVector() and Java 11 Andreas Leitgeb <avl@logic.at> - 2019-04-03 17:33 +0000
Re: DefaultTableModel.getDataVector() and Java 11 Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2019-04-03 11:22 -0700
Re: DefaultTableModel.getDataVector() and Java 11 Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2019-04-03 18:49 +0200
Re: DefaultTableModel.getDataVector() and Java 11 Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2019-04-03 10:34 -0700
csiph-web