Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #19381

Re: Operation in String to Double conversion

Newsgroups	comp.lang.java.programmer
Date	2012-10-15 14:24 -0700
References	(1 earlier) <k5f7gf$p6g$2@localhost.localdomain> <b9f3c86c-4871-45d0-914d-6b345667d892@googlegroups.com> <k5fg4d$nu6$1@dont-email.me> <9ac3b7f9-5751-410f-bac3-50703b976b6d@googlegroups.com> <ba872cf4-ed48-489b-a4fb-3b7f2018dbfe@googlegroups.com>
Message-ID	<fbfe4f3c-61a8-4318-9961-8bc67580f6a6@googlegroups.com> (permalink)
Subject	Re: Operation in String to Double conversion
From	frank.asseg@gmail.com

Show all headers | View raw

On Monday, October 15, 2012 9:40:04 PM UTC+2, Lew wrote:
> If you cannot even promote a product with professionalism and attention to 
> detail, it is very unlikely the product will reflect a higher standard.
again i beg to differ. the code quality has got nothing to do with the manner an article about the library is written. i think judging a developer's skill based on his professionalism as an editor is like saying a monkey can't climb because he sucks at flying.

> He already gave you constructive criticism and you acted like a jerk about it. 
well i certainly didn't call him a jerk for having a different opinion. so in order not to succumb to godwin's law i won't respond to any more posts regarding the manner in which i choose to write.

Thread

Operation in String to Double conversion William Lopes <williamlopes.dev@gmail.com> - 2012-10-14 12:39 -0700
  Re: Operation in String to Double conversion Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2012-10-14 20:32 +0000
    Re: Operation in String to Double conversion William Lopes <williamlopes.dev@gmail.com> - 2012-10-14 14:08 -0700
      Re: Operation in String to Double conversion markspace <-@.> - 2012-10-14 15:59 -0700
        Re: Operation in String to Double conversion William Lopes <williamlopes.dev@gmail.com> - 2012-10-14 17:45 -0700
        Re: Operation in String to Double conversion frank.asseg@gmail.com - 2012-10-15 11:18 -0700
          Re: Operation in String to Double conversion Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2012-10-16 00:14 +0200
            Re: Operation in String to Double conversion frank.asseg@gmail.com - 2012-10-15 15:41 -0700
        Re: Operation in String to Double conversion frank.asseg@gmail.com - 2012-10-15 11:27 -0700
          Re: Operation in String to Double conversion Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-10-15 12:40 -0700
            Re: Operation in String to Double conversion frank.asseg@gmail.com - 2012-10-15 14:24 -0700
              Re: Operation in String to Double conversion Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-10-15 14:48 -0700
              Re: Operation in String to Double conversion Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom2@eastlink.ca> - 2012-10-15 19:14 -0300
                Re: Operation in String to Double conversion Arne Vajhoej <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-10-17 16:58 -0400
              Re: Operation in String to Double conversion Arne Vajhoej <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-10-17 17:02 -0400
            Re: Operation in String to Double conversion Arne Vajhoej <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-10-17 17:13 -0400
              Re: Operation in String to Double conversion Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2012-10-17 17:32 -0400
  Re: Operation in String to Double conversion Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-10-14 22:49 -0700
  Re: Operation in String to Double conversion "John B. Matthews" <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2012-10-15 13:19 -0400
    Re: Operation in String to Double conversion Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-10-15 12:51 -0700
      Re: Operation in String to Double conversion "John B. Matthews" <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2012-10-16 09:39 -0400
  Re: Operation in String to Double conversion Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2012-10-15 20:47 -0400
  Re: Operation in String to Double conversion Arne Vajhoej <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-10-17 16:54 -0400

csiph-web