Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #10576
| From | Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Question re testing constructor |
| Date | 2011-12-06 16:40 -0800 |
| Organization | Canadian Mind Products |
| Message-ID | <ecdtd7p6765svrlhq6u6cc5l7mbfdds9cl@4ax.com> (permalink) |
| References | <Xns9FB3682A7DBF6jpnasty@94.75.214.39> |
On Tue, 6 Dec 2011 15:14:18 +0000 (UTC), Novice <novice@example..com> wrote, quoted or indirectly quoted someone who said : > >It seems to me - correct me if I'm wrong - that I can easily test to make >sure the constructor actually built SOMETHING by testing the object against >null. The idea is to test YOUR code not Sun/Oracle's . Constructors never produce null and never produce objects of the wrong type. Factories might, but not constructors. What you might want is an assert that makes sure you remembered to init all necessary fields in the object. -- Roedy Green Canadian Mind Products http://mindprod.com For me, the appeal of computer programming is that even though I am quite a klutz, I can still produce something, in a sense perfect, because the computer gives me as many chances as I please to get it right.
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Question re testing constructor Novice <novice@example..com> - 2011-12-06 15:14 +0000
Re: Question re testing constructor markspace <-@.> - 2011-12-06 07:23 -0800
Re: Question re testing constructor Novice <novice@example..com> - 2011-12-06 17:17 +0000
Re: Question re testing constructor Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> - 2011-12-06 21:25 +0000
Re: Question re testing constructor Ian Shef <invalid@avoiding.spam> - 2011-12-07 00:29 +0000
Re: Question re testing constructor Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-12-06 19:28 -0800
Re: Question re testing constructor Joshua Cranmer <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> - 2011-12-06 22:57 -0600
Re: Question re testing constructor Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-12-07 07:12 -0800
Re: Question re testing constructor Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-12-07 07:14 -0800
Re: Question re testing constructor Ian Shef <invalid@avoiding.spam> - 2011-12-07 15:59 +0000
Re: Question re testing constructor Ian Shef <invalid@avoiding.spam> - 2011-12-08 19:19 +0000
Re: Question re testing constructor ilAn <idonot@wantspam.net> - 2011-12-07 20:41 +0200
Re: Question re testing constructor Peter Duniho <NpOeStPeAdM@NnOwSlPiAnMk.com> - 2011-12-06 07:34 -0800
Re: Question re testing constructor Novice <novice@example..com> - 2011-12-06 17:15 +0000
Re: Question re testing constructor Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2011-12-06 09:49 -0800
Re: Question re testing constructor Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-12-06 16:40 -0800
Re: Question re testing constructor Henk van Voorthuijsen <voorth@xs4all.nl> - 2011-12-07 00:33 -0800
csiph-web