Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #3841

Re: Isn't an array to int primitive?

Show all headers | View raw

On 5월8일, 오후8시51분, Lew <no...@lewscanon.com> wrote:
> byhesed wrote:
> > byhesed wrote:
> >> I know that primitive type variables cannot be converted to class
> >> type, right?
> >> But, how can the below code operate well?
>
> >> 　　　System.out.println(new int[10] instanceof Object);
>
> >> The result is "true".
>
> >> I am thinking that it is weird.
> >> Isn't the anonymous array primitive type, is it?
> >> Then, how can it be converted to class type, in this case, Object?
>
> >> I think I know something incorrectly.
> >> Please correct my wrong idea.
>
> > Sorry. I've just solved my question.
>
> > The book says that "Arrays are objects."
>
> What book?  Please answer.
>
> The authority is the Java Language Specification (JLS).  Also, GIYF.
> <http://java.sun.com/docs/books/jls/third_edition/html/arrays.html>
>
> Not every tertiary author is as good as every other.  Any author who
> contradicts the JLS is plain wrong.  Some authors explain the concepts very
> well, many do not even when they technically are correct.  The latter category
> includes many bloggers, and the category of incorrect information includes
> many, many more bloggers.
>
> So trust the JLS and augment with a) the official Java tutorials, b) reputable
> writers like Brian Goetz, and c) seminal books such as /Effective Java/, 2nd
> ed., by Joshua Bloch (mandatory reading!).
> <http://java.sun.com/docs/books/effective/>
>
> --
> Lew
> Honi soit qui mal y pense.http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/cf/Friz.jpg

Sorry for late reply.

What I am reading is <Introduction to Java Programming brief verssion
8/e by  Y. Daniel Liang>.

Thank you for your link(JLS), but isn't it too old?

I'll read Effective Java, thank you again.

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Isn't an array to int primitive? byhesed <byhesed@gmail.com> - 2011-05-07 22:07 -0700
  Re: Isn't an array to int primitive? Knute Johnson <nospam@knutejohnson.com> - 2011-05-07 22:10 -0700
    Re: Isn't an array to int primitive? byhesed <byhesed@gmail.com> - 2011-05-07 22:14 -0700
      Re: Isn't an array to int primitive? Knute Johnson <nospam@knutejohnson.com> - 2011-05-07 22:31 -0700
        Re: Isn't an array to int primitive? Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-05-09 00:03 +1200
          Re: Isn't an array to int primitive? Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-08 08:09 -0400
  Re: Isn't an array to int primitive? byhesed <byhesed@gmail.com> - 2011-05-07 22:13 -0700
    Re: Isn't an array to int primitive? Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-08 07:51 -0400
      Re: Isn't an array to int primitive? byhesed <byhesed@gmail.com> - 2011-05-08 21:56 -0700
        Re: Isn't an array to int primitive? Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-09 08:32 -0400
          Re: Isn't an array to int primitive? Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-05-09 07:15 -0700
            Re: Isn't an array to int primitive? byhesed <byhesed@gmail.com> - 2011-05-09 07:31 -0700
  Re: Isn't an array to int primitive? Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-05-07 23:27 -0700
    Re: Isn't an array to int primitive? Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-08 07:54 -0400

csiph-web