Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #10218

Re: Toward more ruly background apps

From thoolen <tholen01@gmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject Re: Toward more ruly background apps
Date 2011-11-25 01:19 -0800
Organization http://groups.google.com
Message-ID <b330bbdd-0ec2-4330-97fe-d1366d49ce99@g21g2000yqc.googlegroups.com> (permalink)
References <2qhsc7d9ib953i1tnipa8jm7i25jbdfhpo@4ax.com> <g9OdnR51zZxd4FPTnZ2dnUVZ_h-dnZ2d@earthlink.com> <56ltc755vbhq5p6lui1lal1io7b1f0g3q1@4ax.com> <jan22h$qv6$1@speranza.aioe.org> <7a23bs$b8e$1@morgoth.sfu.ca>

Show all headers | View raw


On Nov 24, 10:01 pm, "Manh Tuong Lewis Nguyen", an obvious murphy
sock, wrote:
NaN> Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer

NaN> making a fist of a guess, "seamus" Derbyshire, is no
NaN> enhancement of your plagiaristic dumma than a box
NaN> of rocks subterfuge attempts.

Who is "seamus Derbyshire", murphy? There is nobody in this newsgroup
using that alias. And what does your non sequitur have to do with
Java, murphy?

NaN> "seamus" Derbyshire records updated follow -

Who is "seamus Derbyshire", murphy? There is nobody in this newsgroup
using that alias.

NaN> names are missing as I aint so skilled as the "Murphy".

What does your classic contradiction have to do with Java, murphy? You
can't be less skilled than yourself, murphy, despite being very low in
skills in any absolute sense.

   "I had 'volunteered (years back) to support those who do endeavor
    to provide free Free Usenet access, support those who offered
    subscription based Free Usenet access, nothing more than
    cooperation expected in return for what has been many
    thousands of hours of work. I note most of those I joined with
    are either deceased, severely disabled, or plain ole' MIA..
    now it is my Time. ...

    You just read my last. ...

    For those who think they see me in future times I can only wish
    you severe Tinnitus in your dreams. For those who know me
    well (eMail, whatever) and see me, know I will be smiling also.
    It is to you I say "adieu mein frenz and adios .. grazie' [hugs]
    for all the Good Times! May you and yours always bear well
    with all Life brings you".

    /0ut"
      --murphy

http://www.uffnet.com/kookkamp/goodbye.htm

And some people wonder why I call them Famous Last Words.

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Toward more ruly background apps Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-11-24 05:44 -0800
  Re: Toward more ruly background apps Silvio Bierman <silvio@moc.com> - 2011-11-24 16:27 +0100
    Re: Toward more ruly background apps Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-11-24 08:41 -0800
      Re: Toward more ruly background apps Knute Johnson <nospam@knutejohnson.com> - 2011-11-24 09:18 -0800
  Re: Toward more ruly background apps "Jeffrey H. Coffield" <jeffrey@digitalsynergyinc.com> - 2011-11-24 07:34 -0800
    Re: Toward more ruly background apps Tassilo Horn <tassilo@member.fsf.org> - 2011-11-24 17:12 +0100
  Re: Toward more ruly background apps Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-11-24 09:24 -0800
    Re: Toward more ruly background apps Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-11-24 15:36 -0800
      Re: Toward more ruly background apps Fistulina Hepatica <f.hep3@spore.dispersal.org> - 2011-11-24 22:29 -0500
        Re: Toward more ruly background apps "Manh Tuong Lewis Nguyen" <matln@sfu.ca> - 2011-11-25 03:01 +0000
          Re: Toward more ruly background apps thoolen <tholen01@gmail.com> - 2011-11-25 01:19 -0800
        Re: Toward more ruly background apps Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-11-29 16:47 -0800
  Re: Toward more ruly background apps Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-11-24 21:46 -0500

csiph-web