Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #3616

Re: O/T: Awesome vocabulary (Was: should I use java.awt.* only or also use javax.swing in applets?)

Path csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!news.stack.nl!.POSTED!ipv6.urchin.earth.li!twic
From Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li>
Newsgroups comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject Re: O/T: Awesome vocabulary (Was: should I use java.awt.* only or also use javax.swing in applets?)
Date Thu, 5 May 2011 23:31:02 +0100
Organization Stack Usenet News Service
Lines 17
Message-ID <alpine.DEB.2.00.1105052330520.11808@urchin.earth.li> (permalink)
References <ba0c3c4d-cf9e-4b1b-82a8-30b84405b915@17g2000prr.googlegroups.com> <h%kwp.57959$0s5.42695@newsfe17.iad> <nospam-85654B.12160105052011@news.aioe.org> <ipun5u$2v1$1@dont-email.me> <nospam-A3001A.17200805052011@news.aioe.org> <ipv4q1$pbe$4@news.albasani.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host ipv6.urchin.earth.li
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
X-Trace mud.stack.nl 1304634663 13626 2001:ba8:0:1b4::6 (5 May 2011 22:31:03 GMT)
X-Complaints-To abuse@stack.nl
NNTP-Posting-Date Thu, 5 May 2011 22:31:03 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23)
In-Reply-To <ipv4q1$pbe$4@news.albasani.net>
Xref x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:3616

Show key headers only | View raw


On Thu, 5 May 2011, Lew wrote:

> John B. Matthews wrote:
>> Related bugs are notoriously protean and difficult to reproduce;
>                               ^^^^^^^
>> diligence is the only defense.
>
> Awesome vocabulary!

See also:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amoeba_proteus

tom

-- 
Men? Women? Give me a colossal death robot any day!

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

should I use java.awt.* only or also use javax.swing in applets? steveh44 <steve_h44@yahoo.com> - 2011-05-04 14:34 -0700
  Re: should I use java.awt.* only or also use javax.swing in applets? Knute Johnson <nospam@knutejohnson.com> - 2011-05-04 16:07 -0700
    Re: should I use java.awt.* only or also use javax.swing in applets? "John B. Matthews" <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2011-05-05 12:16 -0400
      Re: should I use java.awt.* only or also use javax.swing in applets? markspace <-@.> - 2011-05-05 10:35 -0700
        Re: should I use java.awt.* only or also use javax.swing in applets? "John B. Matthews" <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2011-05-05 17:20 -0400
          O/T: Awesome vocabulary (Was: should I use java.awt.* only or also use javax.swing in applets?) Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-05 17:28 -0400
            Re: O/T: Awesome vocabulary (Was: should I use java.awt.* only or also use javax.swing in applets?) Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> - 2011-05-05 23:31 +0100
              Re: O/T: Awesome vocabulary (Was: should I use java.awt.* only or also use javax.swing in applets?) Jim Janney <jjanney@shell.xmission.com> - 2011-05-05 17:02 -0600
          Re: should I use java.awt.* only or also use javax.swing in applets? markspace <-@.> - 2011-05-05 20:05 -0700
  Re: should I use java.awt.* only or also use javax.swing in applets? Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-04 19:10 -0400
  Re: should I use java.awt.* only or also use javax.swing in applets? Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-05-05 16:47 -0700
  Re: should I use java.awt.* only or also use javax.swing in applets? Andrew Thompson <andrewthommo@gmail.com> - 2011-05-06 03:25 -0700
    Re: should I use java.awt.* only or also use javax.swing in applets? Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2011-05-06 19:06 +0200

csiph-web