Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #2700

Re: Ping Stefan Ram - Teaching object orientation without depending on real-world objects

Path	csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.albasani.net!news.stack.nl!.POSTED!ipv6.urchin.earth.li!twic
From	Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject	Re: Ping Stefan Ram - Teaching object orientation without depending on real-world objects
Date	Fri, 1 Apr 2011 23:25:18 +0100
Organization	Stack Usenet News Service
Lines	46
Message-ID	<alpine.DEB.2.00.1104012324040.16545@urchin.earth.li> (permalink)
References	<alpine.DEB.1.10.1103171800380.17513@urchin.earth.li> <oop-20110401182547@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host	ipv6.urchin.earth.li
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="232016332-2076515094-1301696718=:16545"
X-Trace	mud.stack.nl 1301696718 29740 2001:ba8:0:1b4::6 (1 Apr 2011 22:25:18 GMT)
X-Complaints-To	abuse@stack.nl
NNTP-Posting-Date	Fri, 1 Apr 2011 22:25:18 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent	Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23)
In-Reply-To	<oop-20110401182547@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de>
Xref	x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:2700

Show key headers only | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On Fri, 1 Apr 2011, Stefan Ram wrote:

> Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> writes:
>> I may be imagining this, but weren't you asking about something similar a
>> few months ago?
>
>  It possibly might be a message from 2010-12-18:
>
> Subject: Searching a motivating example for upcasts
> Message-ID: <upcast-20101218173251@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de>
>
>  , which possibly might not be archived in archives.
>
>  There, I wrote:
>
> |I am looking for any real world examples where it is
> |advantageous to limit voluntarily the possibilities of some
> |object in order to make sure that one uses a general
> |procedure on it.
>
> Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> quotes:
>> How might one teach OO without referencing physical real-world objects?
>
>  I give classes on the programming languages C, C++, Java and C#.
>
>  When teaching about OOP in the context of these classes,
>  I usually do not have the idea that I should reference
>  »physical real-world objects« at all.
>
>  My explanation of OOP might proceed as follows:

Aha! Yes, that was it. An interesting discussion, which i was glad to 
re-read. Thanks for directing me to it.

tom

-- 
curry in a sack

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next | Find similar

Thread

Re: Ping Stefan Ram - Teaching object orientation without depending on real-world objects Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> - 2011-04-01 23:25 +0100

csiph-web